This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effective treatment of aspergillosis: A Synthesis of Findings from 32 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effective treatment of aspergillosis: A Synthesis of Findings from 32 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to Dataset
Please check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Key Research Findings

Several key findings have been reported regarding the role of combination antifungal therapy in the treatment of aspergillosis. 13 suggests that clinicians have resorted to the use of combination antifungal therapy due to suboptimal treatment outcomes for invasive aspergillosis (IA). 22 suggests that a therapeutic strategy using nebulized liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) could increase antifungal drug concentration in lung tissue, circumvent drug interactions, and decrease the potential toxicity of systemic antifungal treatments. Moreover, and 18 highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of aspergillosis in immunocompromised individuals, emphasizing the need for research into new diagnostic tools and drug treatment strategies.

Treatment Summary

13 suggests that clinicians have resorted to the use of combination antifungal therapy due to suboptimal treatment outcomes for invasive aspergillosis (IA). 22 suggests that a therapeutic strategy using nebulized liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) could increase antifungal drug concentration in lung tissue, circumvent drug interactions, and decrease the potential toxicity of systemic antifungal treatments. and 18 emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of aspergillosis in immunocompromised individuals.

Benefits and Risks

Benefit Summary

Combination antifungal therapy may improve treatment outcomes for aspergillosis. 13 . A therapeutic strategy using nebulized liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) could increase antifungal drug concentration in lung tissue, circumvent drug interactions, and decrease the potential toxicity of systemic antifungal treatments. 22 . Early diagnosis and treatment may improve patient survival. , 18 .

Risk Summary

Combination antifungal therapy may carry the risk of side effects. 13 . A therapeutic strategy using nebulized liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) has not been sufficiently researched, and the long-term safety is unknown. 22 .

Comparison Between Studies

Commonalities Between Studies

Many studies emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of aspergillosis. 13 , , 18 . They also call for the development of combination antifungal therapy and new treatment approaches. 13 , 22 .

Differences Between Studies

Studies differ in terms of their subjects and treatment approaches. For example, 13 suggests that clinicians have resorted to the use of combination antifungal therapy due to suboptimal treatment outcomes for invasive aspergillosis (IA). On the other hand, 22 reports the effectiveness of a therapeutic strategy using nebulized liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA).

Consistency and Contradictions in Findings

There are still many challenges in treating aspergillosis. Treatment outcomes remain suboptimal, and new treatment approaches are needed. 13 . While a therapeutic strategy using nebulized liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) shows promise, further research is needed on its long-term safety and efficacy. 22 .

Practical Implications and Precautions

It is important to be vigilant in preventing and detecting aspergillosis early. Immunocompromised individuals and those at high risk for aspergillosis should consider regular checkups and prophylactic treatment. , 18 . When receiving treatment, follow your doctor's instructions carefully and be aware of potential side effects.

Limitations of Current Research

Research on the treatment of aspergillosis is still limited. Further research is needed on the effectiveness and safety of new treatment approaches, especially for Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). There is also a lack of long-term follow-up data on ABPA treatment. 22 . Moreover, since diagnosis and treatment methods for aspergillosis can vary depending on the patient and their condition, more individualized treatment approaches are needed.

Future Directions for Research

To improve treatment outcomes for aspergillosis, the development of new treatment approaches and further research on the effectiveness and safety of existing treatments are necessary. 13 . Long-term safety and efficacy studies on a therapeutic strategy using nebulized liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) are also necessary. 22 . The development of new diagnostic tools for early diagnosis of aspergillosis is also crucial. , 18 .

Conclusion

Aspergillosis is a serious infection for immunocompromised individuals. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are essential for improving patient survival. , 18 . Researchers need to continue their efforts to develop more effective treatment approaches and new diagnostic tools. Individuals at high risk for aspergillosis should consider regular checkups and prophylactic treatment.

Treatment List

Combination antifungal therapy, nebulized liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) maintenance therapy, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), early diagnosis, prophylactic treatment


Literature analysis of 32 papers
Positive Content
31
Neutral Content
1
Negative Content
0
Article Type
11
7
21
16
32

Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : Spanish


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : French


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Author: BongominFelix, AsioLucy Grace, OlumRonald, DenningDavid W


Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is a potentially life-threatening debilitating lung disease necessitating long-term oral antifungal treatment. However, development of antifungal-resistant isolates of Aspergillus and major toxicities requiring discontinuation of treatment limits their use. Intravenous (IV) antifungals are an option in this group of patients. We comprehensively evaluate the response rates to IV antifungals in the management of CPA. We searched Medline and Embase databases to select clinical studies providing information about IV amphotericin B or an echinocandin for the treatment of CPA from inception to May 2020. Reviews, single-case reports and case series reporting &lt;10 patients were excluded. We evaluated 12 eligible studies. A total of 380 patients received amphotericin B (n&#160;=&#160;143) or an echinocandin (n&#160;=&#160;237) and were included in the meta-analysis. In a pooled analysis, overall response to IV antifungals was 61% ((95% confidence interval (CI): 52%-70%; I<sup>2</sup> &#160;=&#160;73.3%; P&#160;&lt;&#160;.001), to amphotericin B was 58% (95% CI: 36%-80%; I<sup>2</sup> &#160;=&#160;86.6%; P&#160;&lt;&#160;.001) and to echinocandins was 62% (95% CI: 53%-72%; I<sup>2</sup> &#160;=&#160;63.6%; P&#160;&lt;&#160;.001). Amphotericin B courses were usually doses at slightly &lt;1&#160;mg/Kg (deoxycholate) or 3&#160;mg/Kg (liposomal) for 2-3&#160;weeks. Micafungin doses varied from 12.5 to 300&#160;mg (frequently, 150&#160;mg) daily for at least 3&#160;weeks, and sometimes much longer. Liposomal amphotericin B was well tolerated, but led to renal function loss in 25% of patients. Adverse events were observed in 5-35.3% of patients receiving echinocandins, none of which was considered major. Intravenous antifungals have a place in the management of CPA. A head-to-head comparison of amphotericin B and echinocandins is lacking, and future studies should look at evaluating short- and longer-term outcomes of these agents.

Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Author: GodetCendrine, CouturaudFrancis, Marchand-AdamSylvain, PisonChristophe, GagnadouxFrédéric, BlanchardElodie, TailléCamille, PhilippeBruno, HirschiSandrine, AndréjakClaire, BourdinArnaud, ChenivesseCécile, DominiqueStéphane, BassinetLaurence, Murris-EspinMarlène, RivièreFrédéric, GarciaGilles, CaillaudDenis, BlancFrançois-Xavier, GoupilFrançois, BergeronAnne, GondouinAnne, FratJean-Pierre, FlamentThomas, CamaraBoubou, PriouPascaline, BrunAnne-Laure, LaurentFrançois, RagotStéphanie, CadranelJacques, , GodetC, CouturaudF, CadranelJ, FratJ-P, BrunA-L, LaurentF, Marchand-AdamS, PisonC, GagnadouxF, BlanchardE, TailléC, PhilippeB, HirschiS, AndréjakC, ChenivesseC, DominiqueS, BassinetL, Murris-EspinM, RivièreF, GarciaG, CaillaudD, BlancF-X, GoupilF, GondouinA, FlamentT, CamaraB, PriouP, RagotS


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.