Chelation therapy for coronary heart disease: An overview of all clinical investigations.

Author: ErnstE

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Chelation therapy is popular in the United States. The question of whether it does more good than harm remains controversial. AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize all the clinical evidence for or against the effectiveness and efficacy of chelation therapy for coronary...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2000.107548

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Chelation Therapy for Coronary Heart Disease: A Critical Evaluation

Chelation therapy has gained popularity as a purported treatment for coronary heart disease, but its effectiveness remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate the clinical evidence for or against the efficacy of chelation therapy. The authors conducted a thorough search of published studies, including both controlled and uncontrolled trials. Their analysis revealed a striking lack of convincing evidence supporting the efficacy of chelation therapy. While numerous case reports and series suggested benefits, only two controlled clinical trials were identified, and these provided no evidence beyond a potential placebo effect.

The Lack of Scientific Evidence for Chelation Therapy

The review's findings raise serious concerns about the use of chelation therapy for coronary heart disease. It's like searching for a mirage in the desert; what appears promising at first glance may be an illusion. Despite the claims and anecdotal reports, the scientific evidence does not support the effectiveness of chelation therapy. This underscores the importance of relying on robust clinical trials and evidence-based medicine to guide healthcare decisions.

Making Informed Decisions About Your Health

When it comes to your health, it's crucial to rely on evidence-based medicine and to discuss treatment options with your doctor. They can help you make informed decisions based on the best available scientific evidence. Just as a camel needs to carefully assess the terrain and water sources before embarking on a desert journey, you need to carefully evaluate your health options and make choices that are supported by sound science.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This review provides a comprehensive and critical analysis of the evidence surrounding chelation therapy for coronary heart disease. The lack of robust scientific support raises significant concerns about its use and emphasizes the importance of relying on evidence-based medicine to guide healthcare decisions. As we continue to explore the vast desert of medical knowledge, we need to be discerning and critical in evaluating the effectiveness of various treatments. Only by following the path of scientific evidence can we ensure the best possible health outcomes for our patients.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2000-09-27
  2. Date Revised 2022-11-18
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

10874275

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1067/mhj.2000.107548

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.