[A randomized, double-blind, multicentre study on comparing levonorgestrel and mifepristone for emergency contraception].

Author: WangC, WangY, WuS

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, side effects and the effect on next menstruation of levonorgestrel(LNG) to low dose mifepristone in emergency contraception. METHODS: The study is a randomized double-blind multicenter comparative trial. The clients who have unprotected intercourse within 72 hour...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11360606

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Emergency Contraception: A Comparative Study of Levonorgestrel and Mifepristone

The vast desert of reproductive health research is constantly seeking new oases of hope for individuals seeking effective and safe contraception. This study explores the efficacy and safety of two commonly used emergency contraception methods: levonorgestrel (LNG) and mifepristone. The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparative trial to compare the effectiveness, side effects, and impact on menstruation of these two methods. The study found that mifepristone was more effective in preventing pregnancy compared to levonorgestrel. The study also noted that both methods were well tolerated and had minimal side effects. This research provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness and safety of these two commonly used emergency contraception methods.

A New Perspective on Emergency Contraception

This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and safety of two commonly used emergency contraception methods. The research demonstrates that mifepristone is more effective in preventing pregnancy compared to levonorgestrel. This finding offers a new perspective on the choice of emergency contraception methods, providing healthcare professionals with additional information to guide patient counseling and decision-making. This study also highlights the importance of understanding the potential impact of these methods on menstrual cycles.

Navigating the Desert of Reproductive Choices

This study underscores the importance of providing individuals with comprehensive information about available reproductive health options. The research highlights the importance of understanding the relative effectiveness and safety of different contraception methods to make informed choices. Just as a camel navigates the vast desert landscape, individuals must have access to the information and resources needed to make informed decisions about their reproductive health.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study offers valuable insights into the effectiveness and safety of two commonly used emergency contraception methods. The research demonstrates that mifepristone is more effective in preventing pregnancy compared to levonorgestrel, providing a new perspective on the choice of emergency contraception methods. Like a skilled camel guide leading a caravan through the desert, we must continue to explore new and effective approaches to reproductive health, ensuring the well-being of all individuals.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2001-05-31
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

11360606

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

11360606

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

Chinese

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.