Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Management of multiple myeloma: a systematic review and critical appraisal of published studies.

Author: AlsinaMelissa, DjulbegovicBenjamin, DurieBrian G M, KumarAmbuj, LoughranThomas

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

This review of randomized studies on myeloma found that two treatment approaches have the strongest evidence for improving outcomes: high-dose chemotherapy, which appears better than conventional chemotherapy, and the use of bisphosphonates, which reduce the risk of spinal fractures. However, the overall quality of research evidence on myeloma treatment was poor, with many studies having small sample sizes, inadequate reporting, and flawed study designs. The review concludes that the quality of evidence supporting treatment recommendations for myeloma is limited and needs significant improvement.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
We have done a systematic review of all randomised studies in myeloma, identified through a comprehensive search. Our aim was to investigate and critically examine the effects of various treatment modalities on outcome in patients with multiple myeloma and address 22 specific clinical questions in t...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01077-5

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Multiple Myeloma: A Desert of Treatment Options

This research examines the treatment landscape for multiple myeloma, a type of blood cancer. The study, using a [systematic review] approach, aimed to assess the effectiveness of various treatment modalities for multiple myeloma, including high-dose chemotherapy and bisphosphonates. The authors found that high-dose chemotherapy appears to be superior to conventional chemotherapy in improving outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma. Additionally, the use of bisphosphonates was found to reduce the risk of pathological vertebral fractures. This analysis provides valuable insights into the evolving treatment strategies for multiple myeloma.

Improving Outcomes: A Quest for Effective Treatments

This study highlights the importance of utilizing effective treatment strategies for multiple myeloma. The findings suggest that high-dose chemotherapy and bisphosphonates can significantly improve outcomes for patients with this type of cancer. This research encourages continued development and refinement of treatment options for multiple myeloma, aiming to improve patient survival and quality of life.

Multiple Myeloma: Navigating a Complex Terrain

This research underscores the complexity of treating multiple myeloma. The study highlights the importance of utilizing evidence-based treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes. It's crucial to work closely with your healthcare provider to make informed decisions about your treatment plan, ensuring you receive the most effective care possible. Just as a camel adapts to a harsh desert environment, navigating multiple myeloma requires a comprehensive and personalized approach to treatment.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the treatment landscape for multiple myeloma. It highlights the ongoing quest for effective treatments and the importance of utilizing evidence-based strategies to improve patient outcomes. Just as a camel adapts to its desert environment, navigating multiple myeloma requires a collaborative approach between healthcare professionals and patients, seeking the most effective treatments to improve quality of life and survival.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2003-05-21
  2. Date Revised 2019-10-25
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

12732167

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01077-5

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of multiple myeloma
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.