Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Cost-effectiveness of brief cognitive behaviour therapy versus treatment as usual in recurrent deliberate self-harm: a decision-making approach.

Author: , ByfordS, DavidsonK, GreenshieldsJ, JonesV, KnappM, SchmidtU, ThompsonS, TyrerP, UkoumunneO C

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

Manual-assisted cognitive behaviour therapy (MACT) was found to be a more cost-effective strategy than treatment as usual for reducing the recurrence of deliberate self-harm in patients with a history of recurrent deliberate self-harm.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Deliberate self-harm can be costly, in terms of treatment and subsequent suicide. Any intervention that reduces episodes of self-harm might therefore have a major impact on the costs incurred by service providers and the productivity losses due to illness or premature death. METHOD: Fou...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291703008183

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Cost-Effectiveness of Brief Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Recurrent Deliberate Self-Harm

We're venturing into the realm of mental health, specifically examining the cost-effectiveness of brief cognitive behaviour therapy (MACT) in treating recurrent deliberate self-harm. This study, a randomized controlled trial, compares MACT with treatment as usual (TAU) in a cohort of patients with a history of self-harm. The research investigates the cost-effectiveness of MACT in reducing the recurrence of self-harm, considering both clinical and economic outcomes.

MACT: A Cost-Effective Approach to Managing Recurrent Self-Harm

This study provides compelling evidence for the cost-effectiveness of MACT in reducing the recurrence of deliberate self-harm. While the economic benefits of MACT were not statistically significant at 12 months, the analysis suggests a high probability that MACT is a more cost-effective strategy than TAU over a year. The findings, like a clear path through a dense forest, offer valuable insights for healthcare professionals in optimizing treatment strategies for self-harm.

Managing Self-Harm

Self-harm is a complex issue that requires comprehensive care. This study highlights the importance of evidence-based treatment approaches, such as MACT, in addressing this challenging condition. If you or someone you know is struggling with self-harm, seeking professional help is crucial.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research, like a compass guiding us towards effective mental health treatment, underscores the cost-effectiveness of MACT in managing recurrent self-harm. The study offers a valuable roadmap for healthcare professionals, emphasizing the importance of investing in evidence-based interventions to improve patient outcomes.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2004-01-14
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

12946082

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1017/s0033291703008183

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of self-harm
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.