Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing.

Author: ClevelandMark vB, DiPalmaJack A, MeagherAlan, WolffBruce G

Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.

Overview

This study compared a reduced volume lavage regimen with standard 4 L SF-ELS lavage for safety and efficacy in colonoscopy preparation. The researchers found that the reduced volume regimen was as effective and well-tolerated as the standard 4 L regimen.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
In an attempt to improve patient tolerance for colonoscopy cleansing, a reduced volume lavage regimen with 2 L sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution (SF-ELS, NuLYTELY, Braintree Laboratories, Braintree, MA) plus 20 mg p.o. bisacodyl (Half Lytely, Braintree Laboratories) was compared with standard...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07690.x

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Optimizing Colonoscopy Preparation: A Comparative Study

This research delves into the realm of colonoscopy preparation, exploring ways to improve patient comfort and tolerance during this common procedure. The study investigates the effectiveness of a reduced volume lavage regimen, utilizing 2 liters of sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution (SF-ELS) and bisacodyl, compared to the standard 4-liter SF-ELS lavage. The researchers sought to determine whether the reduced volume approach could provide comparable colon cleansing efficacy while minimizing patient discomfort.

Seeking a More Comfortable Colonoscopy

The study found that the reduced volume lavage regimen was just as effective as the standard 4-liter lavage in preparing patients for colonoscopy. Furthermore, the reduced volume approach was better tolerated by patients, suggesting that it could significantly enhance their experience.

Patient Comfort and Procedure Efficiency

The findings suggest that the reduced volume lavage regimen could be a valuable alternative for colonoscopy preparation. By reducing the volume of solution needed, patients may experience less bloating, nausea, and other discomforts associated with traditional colon cleansing.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

Imagine a camel traversing a desert, seeking the most comfortable and efficient path to reach its destination. The reduced volume lavage regimen is like a smoother, more pleasant journey for patients undergoing colonoscopy, providing a more comfortable experience without compromising the effectiveness of the preparation.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2003-11-26
  2. Date Revised 2019-05-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

14572566

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07690.x

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.