Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

PEG 3350 (Transipeg) versus lactulose in the treatment of childhood functional constipation: a double blind, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial.

Author: BenningaM, HeijmansJ, HogemanP, MäkelW, TaminiauJ, VerwijsW, VoskuijlW, de LorijnF

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

Polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG 3350) was more effective than lactulose in treating pediatric constipation with a higher success rate and fewer side effects. PEG 3350 should be the laxative of first choice in childhood constipation.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Recently, polyethylene glycol (PEG 3350) has been suggested as a good alternative laxative to lactulose as a treatment option in paediatric constipation. However, no large randomised controlled trials exist evaluating the efficacy of either laxative. AIMS: To compare PEG 3350 (Transipeg...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1774276/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

PEG 3350 vs. Lactulose: Finding the Best Path for Childhood Constipation

This research delves into the world of [constipation], a common childhood ailment. It's like having a camel that's stuck in the sand, unable to move forward. The researchers compared the effectiveness of two common laxatives, [polyethylene glycol (PEG 3350)] and [lactulose], in treating [functional constipation] in children. Their findings suggest that PEG 3350 might be a better option, providing a higher success rate with fewer side effects.

PEG 3350 Takes the Lead: A Smoother Path for Constipation Relief

The study revealed that PEG 3350 was more effective than lactulose in treating constipation in children. It's like finding a smoother path through the desert, leading to a more comfortable and efficient journey. This research provides valuable insights for parents and doctors, suggesting that PEG 3350 could be a preferred option for managing childhood constipation.

A Smoother Journey: Finding Relief from Constipation

This study highlights the importance of finding the right treatment for childhood constipation. It's like choosing the right camel for your journey through the desert, ensuring a smooth and comfortable ride. This research offers valuable insights for parents and doctors, helping them navigate the challenges of childhood constipation and find the most effective treatment options.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study sheds light on the importance of choosing the right treatment for childhood constipation. It's like finding the perfect oasis in the desert, providing the ideal solution for a common childhood ailment. This research offers valuable insights for parents and doctors, helping them make informed decisions about the best treatment options for their children.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2004-12-02
  2. Date Revised 2018-11-30
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

15479678

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC1774276

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Side Effects of lactulose
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.