Extrapyramidal side effects of antiemetics presenting as psychiatric illness.

Author: RodgersC

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Although extrapyramidal side effects of two commonly used antiemetics, metoclopramide and prochlorperazine, are well known, it may be difficult for even the experienced practitioner to distinguish some of these extrapyramidal reactions from such psychiatric symptoms as anxiety, depression, or catato...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(92)90082-l

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Extrapyramidal Side Effects of Antiemetics Mimicking Psychiatric Illness

This research delves into the complex interplay between antiemetics and psychiatric symptoms, highlighting the potential for extrapyramidal side effects to mimic mental illness. The authors explore the common antiemetics metoclopramide and prochlorperazine, discussing the difficulties in distinguishing between extrapyramidal reactions and genuine psychiatric conditions, particularly depression, anxiety, and catatonia. The study identifies certain patient groups as being more susceptible to extrapyramidal reactions, including those under 30, those with AIDS or renal disease, oncology patients, and possibly women. The authors emphasize the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for extrapyramidal side effects when patients are taking antiemetics, particularly in those with known risk factors.

The Challenge of Differential Diagnosis

This research highlights the challenge of differential diagnosis when evaluating patients presenting with psychiatric symptoms, particularly those taking antiemetics. The study underscores the importance of considering extrapyramidal side effects as a potential cause of these symptoms, especially in vulnerable populations. The findings emphasize the need for a comprehensive assessment that considers both the patient's medical history and the potential side effects of medications.

Ensuring Accurate Diagnosis and Appropriate Treatment

This study highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment when managing psychiatric symptoms in patients taking antiemetics. The authors emphasize the need for a high index of suspicion for extrapyramidal side effects, particularly in those with known risk factors. This research encourages a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, involving both medical and psychiatric professionals, to ensure that patients receive the most appropriate and effective treatment.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research reminds us that the desert of mental health can be tricky to navigate, with many potential pitfalls and confusing pathways. The study highlights the importance of considering extrapyramidal side effects as a potential cause of psychiatric symptoms, particularly in patients taking antiemetics. By maintaining a high index of suspicion and utilizing a multidisciplinary approach, we can ensure that patients receive accurate diagnoses and effective treatment.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1992-07-14
  2. Date Revised 2019-09-12
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

1601295

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/0163-8343(92)90082-l

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.