A naturalistic evaluation of intramuscular ziprasidone versus intramuscular olanzapine for the management of acute agitation and aggression in children and adolescents.

Author: KhanShamima S, MicanLisa M

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intramuscular ziprasidone versus intramuscular (i.m.) olanzapine in treating aggression in youth. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 100 hospitalized patients less than 18 years of age treated with either i.m. ziprasid...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2006.16.671

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Ziprasidone vs. Olanzapine: Navigating the Desert of Aggression in Youth

This research dives into the challenging terrain of managing aggression in youth, comparing the effectiveness of two medications, intramuscular ziprasidone and intramuscular olanzapine. It's like navigating a vast desert, seeking the best path to calm the storm within. The study analyzed data from hospitalized patients under 18 who were treated with either ziprasidone or olanzapine for aggression. The researchers compared the medications' efficacy, safety, and impact on various parameters such as length of stay, restraints, and emergency medications. Their findings, like a welcome oasis in the desert, suggest that both medications may be equally effective in treating aggression in youth, with similar safety profiles.

Similar Efficacy: A Promising Path to Peace

The study showed no significant difference in the efficacy of intramuscular ziprasidone and olanzapine for treating aggression in youth. This means that both medications appear to be equally effective in calming aggression and reducing agitation in this population. This finding is important, as it gives clinicians more options for treating aggression in young patients.

Navigating the Safety Desert: Caution and Further Research

The research also highlights the importance of careful monitoring for potential side effects. While the study didn't reveal significant safety concerns, it emphasizes the need for ongoing research to further assess the long-term effects and safety of both medications. This caution is essential, especially considering the unique needs and vulnerabilities of young patients.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study, like a desert guide, provides valuable insights into the treatment of aggression in youth. While both ziprasidone and olanzapine appear to be effective, further research is crucial to ensure the safety and long-term efficacy of these medications.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2007-03-01
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

17201611

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1089/cap.2006.16.671

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.