Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Controlled study of heparin versus epoprostenol sodium (prostacyclin) as the sole anticoagulant for chronic hemodialysis.
Author: CaruanaR J, ClyneD, CrowJ W, DiehlJ H, SmithM C, ZinnJ M
Original Abstract of the Article :
We performed a controlled parallel study comparing the effects of heparin sodium to epoprostenol sodium (prostacyclin sodium, Flolan) during hemodialysis in 30 dialysis patients. Mean fiber bundle volume loss and dialyzer function were similar with both anticoagulation methods. Intradialytic symptom...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1159/000170027
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Heparin vs. Epoprostenol: A Showdown in the Dialysis Desert
Chronic hemodialysis, a life-sustaining treatment for those with kidney failure, often requires anticoagulation to prevent blood clots. This study investigates the use of two anticoagulants, heparin and epoprostenol, in hemodialysis patients. The researchers conducted a controlled parallel study to compare the effectiveness and safety of these two drugs in 30 dialysis patients. Their findings reveal a fascinating comparison, highlighting the potential advantages and disadvantages of each anticoagulant.Navigating the Challenges of Dialysis
The study found that both heparin and epoprostenol were effective in preventing blood clots and maintaining dialyzer function during hemodialysis. While both drugs were effective in preventing blood clots, epoprostenol was associated with a higher incidence of intradialytic symptoms. This suggests that epoprostenol, while effective, might not be suitable for all patients. Like navigating a treacherous desert, we need to carefully consider the individual needs of each patient to determine the most appropriate treatment.Exploring New Frontiers in Dialysis
The study provides valuable insights into the use of epoprostenol as an alternative to heparin in hemodialysis. While epoprostenol can be effective, its potential for causing symptoms might limit its use in some patients. This study is a reminder that there's still room for innovation and exploration in the field of dialysis. We must continue to search for safer and more effective treatment options for patients with kidney failure.Dr. Camel's Conclusion
This study showcases the potential benefits and challenges of using epoprostenol as an anticoagulant during hemodialysis. The researchers highlight the importance of carefully considering individual patient needs and monitoring for potential side effects. This study emphasizes that the desert of dialysis research is vast and ever-changing, and that we must continuously seek out new and innovative treatment options for patients with kidney failure.Date :
- Date Completed 1992-07-29
- Date Revised 2018-02-15
Further Info :
Related Literature
Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages
English
Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.