Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint.

Author: AchtenJuul, CostaMatthew L, EdlinRichard P, GriffinDamian R, ParsonsNick R

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

Hip replacement surgery is very successful for people with severe hip arthritis, especially for older patients. However, traditional implants often fail in younger, active people within 25 years. Hip resurfacing is a newer procedure that shows promising short-term results, but some potential early drawbacks include the risk of fracture and head collapse. This study compares the function of hips one year after surgery for total hip replacement and hip resurfacing. It also examines complication rates and cost-effectiveness of both procedures.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Hip replacement (arthroplasty) surgery is a highly successful treatment for patients with severe symptomatic arthritis of the hip joint. For older patients, several designs of Total Hip Arthroplasty have shown excellent results in terms of both function and value for money. However, in younger more ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2826290/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Total Hip Arthroplasty vs. Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Choice for Young Patients

The quest to alleviate pain and restore mobility for patients with hip arthritis is a journey through the desert of orthopedic surgery. This study compares the outcomes of two surgical procedures, total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing arthroplasty, in the treatment of young patients with hip arthritis. The researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the functional outcomes, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness of both procedures.

Navigating the Options for Hip Arthritis

The study found no significant difference in functional hip scores at one year post-operation between THA and resurfacing arthroplasty. However, the researchers noted potential early disadvantages associated with resurfacing arthroplasty, including the risk of femoral neck fracture and collapse of the head of the femur.

Implications for Hip Replacement Surgery

The findings suggest that both THA and resurfacing arthroplasty can effectively improve hip function in young patients. However, the study also highlights the need for careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits of each procedure, taking into account factors such as age, activity level, and bone quality.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

The decision of whether to undergo THA or resurfacing arthroplasty is a complex one, much like choosing the best path through a vast and unforgiving desert. This study provides valuable insights into the relative merits of each procedure, enabling patients and surgeons to make informed decisions that best serve their individual needs.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2010-07-09
  2. Date Revised 2022-03-16
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

20074324

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC2826290

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of hip replacement
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.