Double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of famotidine with ranitidine in patients with endoscopically diagnosed peptic ulcer.

Author: BowalekarS K, JhaR J, NanivadekarS A, NavaniS R, OkeV G, PatelH D, RaghuC N, SawantP D, ShroffC P

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
In a double-blind randomised trial, 40 patients with active gastric or duodenal ulcer were treated with a single nocturnal dose of famotidine 40 mg or ranitidine 300 mg for 4 to 8 weeks. Antacid tablets were allowed as additional treatment, only if needed, for pain relief. Endoscopy was repeated aft...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2092029

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Comparing Famotidine and Ranitidine for Peptic Ulcers

This research delves into the world of peptic ulcer disease, a common and often painful condition affecting the lining of the stomach and duodenum. The researchers conducted a double-blind trial to compare the efficacy and safety of famotidine and ranitidine, two medications used to treat peptic ulcers. This research is like navigating a vast and challenging desert, seeking to find the best route to heal and soothe the pain of peptic ulcers.

The study found that both famotidine and ranitidine were effective in healing peptic ulcers and providing relief from symptoms. Both drugs were also well-tolerated, with no significant side effects reported. This discovery is like finding two different paths across a desert, each leading to the same destination and offering a comfortable journey.

Effective Treatment for Peptic Ulcers

This research provides valuable insights into the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. It suggests that both famotidine and ranitidine are effective options for healing ulcers and relieving symptoms. This is like finding two reliable oases in the desert of peptic ulcer disease, each offering respite and healing.

Health Implications and Everyday Applications

This study provides valuable information for healthcare professionals and individuals seeking treatment for peptic ulcers. It suggests that both famotidine and ranitidine are effective and well-tolerated options, offering a range of choices to address this common condition. This is like finding multiple paths across a desert, each leading to the same destination and offering a variety of options to suit individual needs.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study, like a camel caravan traversing a vast and challenging desert, guides us towards a better understanding of the treatment options for peptic ulcers. The study highlights the efficacy and safety of both famotidine and ranitidine, providing valuable information for healthcare professionals and patients alike.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1991-06-12
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

2092029

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

2092029

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.