Historical prostate cancer screening and treatment outcomes from a single institution.

Author: CrossDeanna S, RedingDouglas J, RitterMark

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: To quantify outcomes of individuals diagnosed and treated for prostate cancer in a single institution. DESIGN: Retrospective electronic chart abstraction. SETTING: Marshfield Clinic, the largest private multispecialty group practice in Wisconsin, and one of the largest in the United Sta...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3421330/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment Outcomes: A Comprehensive Look

In the vast expanse of cancer research, understanding the impact of screening and treatment on prostate cancer outcomes is like finding a hidden oasis amidst the dunes. This study, conducted at a single institution, analyzed data from individuals diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1960 and 2009. The researchers discovered that the average age of diagnosis has decreased since the advent of PSA screening, reflecting a shift in detection patterns. Although PSA screening was prevalent, it didn't seem to affect treatment outcomes. Importantly, the study found that age, tumor grade, and stage were the most significant factors influencing prostate cancer outcomes. This research provides valuable insights into the historical trends and prognostic factors associated with prostate cancer, guiding clinicians in optimizing patient care.

The Impact of PSA Screening: A Mixed Bag

While the study suggests that PSA screening has led to earlier diagnosis, it didn't significantly impact overall treatment outcomes. This finding underscores the complexity of prostate cancer and the need for a nuanced approach to screening and treatment. The study also highlighted the importance of factors like age, grade, and stage in determining prognosis, suggesting that these variables should be considered in personalized treatment plans.

Navigating the Prostate Cancer Landscape: A Holistic Approach

This research emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive approach to prostate cancer care, incorporating both screening and treatment strategies. It's essential to discuss potential benefits and risks of PSA screening with your healthcare provider and to consider individual factors like age, family history, and overall health status when making informed decisions about screening and treatment options.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study, like a compass navigating the vast desert of prostate cancer research, provides valuable insights into the role of screening and treatment over time. The findings highlight the complexity of this disease and the need for a multi-faceted approach to care, recognizing the importance of individual factors and ongoing research in optimizing patient outcomes.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2012-12-27
  2. Date Revised 2021-10-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

22537761

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC3421330

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.