Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

A randomized, prospective, comparison study of a mixture of acacia fiber, psyllium fiber, and fructose vs polyethylene glycol 3350 with electrolytes for the treatment of chronic functional constipation in childhood.

Author: CampanozziAngelo, ChiaroAndrea, CoccorulloPaola, CucchiaraSalvatore, Di NardoGiovanni, GiannettiEleonora, PoliEmanuela, QuitadamoPaolo, RomanoClaudio, StaianoAnnamaria

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

A mixture of acacia fiber, psyllium fiber, and fructose (AFPFF) was found to be as effective as polyethylene glycol 3350 combined with electrolytes (PEG+E) in treating children with chronic functional constipation (CFC). AFPFF was also found to be safe and effective in treating children with CFC.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
To compare the effectiveness of a mixture of acacia fiber, psyllium fiber, and fructose (AFPFF) with polyethylene glycol 3350 combined with electrolytes (PEG+E) in the treatment of children with chronic functional constipation (CFC); and to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AFPFF in the treat...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.04.043

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Easing the Journey: Exploring Treatment Options for Childhood Constipation

The field of [chronic functional constipation] in childhood is a complex one, and finding effective treatments can be a challenge. This study compares the effectiveness of two different treatment approaches: [a mixture of acacia fiber, psyllium fiber, and fructose] (AFPFF) and [polyethylene glycol 3350 combined with electrolytes] (PEG+E). The researchers conducted a [randomized, prospective comparison study] to assess the impact of these treatments on [constipation symptoms] in children.

Finding the Right Path: Comparing Treatment Options for Childhood Constipation

This study provides valuable insight into the different treatment options available for [chronic functional constipation] in children. It's like navigating a desert with different paths leading to the same oasis (relief from constipation). The researchers compared the effectiveness of [AFPFF] and [PEG+E], offering parents and healthcare providers a more informed approach to choosing the best treatment option for their child.

A Smooth Passage: Improving Digestive Health for Children

This research is a reminder that addressing [constipation] in children is crucial for their overall health and well-being. Finding the right treatment approach can make a significant difference in their quality of life. The study findings highlight the importance of individualized care and a thorough understanding of different treatment options for [constipation] in children.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study explores the different approaches to treating [chronic functional constipation] in children, offering valuable insights for parents and healthcare providers. The study findings highlight the importance of finding the right path to address this common condition and improve the overall health and well-being of children.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2013-01-01
  2. Date Revised 2018-12-01
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

22677568

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.04.043

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.