Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Surgical adverse events: a systematic review.

Author: AndersonOliver, DavisRachel, HannaGeorge B, VincentCharles A

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.

Overview

A systematic review of 14 record review studies found that adverse events occurred in 14.4% of surgical patients, with 5.2% of these events being potentially preventable. The consequences of 3.6% of adverse events were fatal, 10.4% were severe, 34.2% were moderate, and 52.5% were minor. Errors in nonoperative management were more frequent than errors in surgical technique.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review is to quantify potentially preventable patient harm from the frequency, severity, and preventability of the consequences and causes of surgical adverse events to help target patient safety improvement efforts. DATA SOURCES: Two authors independently rev...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.009

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Unveiling the Hidden Dangers of Surgical Adverse Events

Surgery, a complex procedure, is not without its risks. This systematic review dives deep into the desert of surgical adverse events (SAEs) to quantify the frequency, severity, and preventability of these events. The researchers analyzed data from fourteen retrospective studies, encompassing over 16,000 surgical patients, to gain a clearer picture of the risks associated with surgery. The study revealed a concerning rate of SAEs, highlighting the need for continuous improvement in patient safety.

Minimizing the Risk of Surgical Adverse Events: A Call for Vigilance

The study found that SAEs occurred in 14.4% of patients, with 5.2% of these events potentially preventable. The consequences of these events ranged from minor to fatal, with 3.6% resulting in death. The research also revealed that errors in nonoperative management, rather than surgical technique, were the more frequent cause of SAEs. These findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive care and vigilance throughout the entire surgical journey.

Navigating the Landscape of Surgical Safety: A Shared Responsibility

The study's findings serve as a stark reminder of the importance of patient safety in the realm of surgery. It underscores the need for continuous improvement in surgical practices, with a focus on reducing preventable errors and improving communication throughout the care process. This research calls for a shared responsibility between surgeons, nurses, and healthcare professionals to ensure the safety of all patients undergoing surgery.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

The desert of surgery, while offering the promise of healing, also harbors hidden dangers. This systematic review exposes the prevalence of surgical adverse events, emphasizing the need for vigilance and continuous improvement in patient safety. By understanding the risks and implementing proactive measures, we can navigate the landscape of surgical care with greater confidence and ensure the best possible outcomes for our patients.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2013-09-23
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23642651

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.009

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.