Adverse events associated with meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin therapy in a large retrospective cohort of hospitalized infants.

Author: , BenjaminDaniel K, CapparelliEdmund V, ClarkReese H, Cohen-WolkowiezMichael, HerringAmy H, HornikChristoph P, KearnsGregory L, SmithP Brian, van den AnkerJohn

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Carbapenems are commonly used in hospitalized infants despite a lack of complete safety data and associations with seizures in older children. We compared the incidence of adverse events in hospitalized infants receiving meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin. METHODS: We conducted a retr...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23838776

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Meropenem vs. Imipenem/Cilastatin in Infants: Navigating the Desert of Pediatric Antibiotic Therapy

This retrospective cohort study investigates the safety of two common carbapenem antibiotics, meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin, in hospitalized infants. It's like comparing two different paths through a desert, each with its own potential risks and benefits. The study analyzed data from 5566 infants treated with one of these antibiotics, finding that meropenem was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events, but these events were generally less severe. The authors conclude that while meropenem may be associated with more frequent side effects, it appears to be a safer option for infants in terms of death and seizures.

The Balance of Risks and Benefits: A Careful Journey

This study highlights the importance of weighing risks and benefits when choosing antibiotics for infants. It's like carefully navigating a desert path, considering the potential obstacles and choosing the route that offers the best balance of safety and effectiveness. While meropenem may be associated with more frequent side effects, the study's findings suggest that it may be a better option for infants in terms of overall outcome. This information can help clinicians make more informed decisions about antibiotic therapy for infants.

Protecting Our Little Ones: A Desert Oasis of Pediatric Care

This study provides valuable insights into the safety and efficacy of antibiotics for infants. It emphasizes the importance of careful monitoring and consideration of individual factors when selecting antibiotics. The authors' findings can help clinicians make informed decisions that prioritize the well-being of their young patients, ensuring a safe and effective path through the desert of pediatric antibiotic therapy.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

The world of antibiotic therapy is a vast and complex desert, with different paths offering various risks and rewards. This study reminds us that the choice of antibiotic for infants requires careful consideration, balancing the potential benefits with the potential risks. The authors' findings provide valuable insights into the safety of meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin, guiding us toward a safer and more effective path for our littlest desert travelers.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2014-02-06
  2. Date Revised 2023-09-19
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23838776

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

NIHMS454264

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.