Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Electrotherapy for neck pain.

Author: BurnieStephen J, ForgetMario, GoldsmithCharles H, GrahamNadine, GrossAnita, HainesTed, KroelingPeter, SzetoGrace

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch funding provided by the NIH to external research institutions and researchers.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

This systematic review assessed the short, intermediate, and long-term effects of electrotherapy on pain, function, disability, patient satisfaction, global perceived effect, and quality of life in adults with neck pain. The evidence was of low or very low quality and could not make any definite statements on the efficacy and clinical usefulness of electrotherapy modalities for neck pain. Further research is necessary.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Neck pain is common, disabling and costly. The effectiveness of electrotherapy as a physiotherapeutic option remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 and previously updated in 2009. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review assessed the short, intermediat...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696490/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Electrotherapy for Neck Pain

This study investigates the effectiveness of electrotherapy as a treatment for neck pain. The study reviewed 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included 1239 individuals with neck pain. The study found inconsistent evidence regarding the effectiveness of electrotherapy for neck pain, with some modalities, such as pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) and repetitive magnetic stimulation (rMS), showing potential benefits. However, the study concluded that further research is needed to determine the efficacy and clinical usefulness of electrotherapy for neck pain.

Electrotherapy: A Potential Treatment for Neck Pain

This research provides a comprehensive review of the evidence regarding the use of electrotherapy for neck pain. The study's findings suggest that some electrotherapeutic modalities, such as PEMF and rMS, may hold promise for reducing neck pain, but further research is needed to confirm their effectiveness.

Navigating Neck Pain: Exploring Treatment Options

This study highlights the need for further research to determine the optimal use of electrotherapy for patients with neck pain. The study's findings emphasize the importance of carefully evaluating the potential benefits and risks of electrotherapy in individual patients, with more research needed to confirm the effectiveness of specific modalities.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study examines the efficacy of electrotherapy for neck pain, highlighting the need for further research to determine the optimal use of different modalities. The study’s findings underscore the importance of individualized care and a comprehensive approach to managing neck pain. It’s a reminder that even in the vast desert of pain management, finding the right solution requires careful consideration and ongoing research.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2014-02-06
  2. Date Revised 2023-12-07
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23979926

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC10696490

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Side Effects of magnets
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.