Comparison of the discontinuation rates and side-effect profiles of pilocarpine and cevimeline for xerostomia in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Author: BakerJoshua F, NoaisehGhaith, VivinoFrederick B

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
There are currently no head-to-head comparisons of sialagogues for Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). We compared the tolerability and side effect profile of pilocarpine and cevimeline in patients with pSS and determined clinical, laboratory and pathological variables associated with therapeutic fail...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25065774

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Sialagogues for Xerostomia in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: Comparing Pilocarpine and Cevimeline

Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is an autoimmune disorder that often leads to dry mouth, known as xerostomia. This condition can significantly impact quality of life, affecting eating, speaking, and overall well-being. This study compared the tolerability and side effect profile of two sialagogues, pilocarpine and cevimeline, in patients with pSS. The researchers sought to identify factors associated with therapeutic failure, providing valuable insights into the effectiveness and potential limitations of these medications. This study, like a well-mapped desert route, guides clinicians in navigating the treatment landscape for xerostomia in pSS.

Navigating the Treatment Landscape for Xerostomia in pSS

The study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and potential limitations of pilocarpine and cevimeline for xerostomia in pSS. The findings underscore the importance of considering individual patient characteristics and the potential for side effects when choosing a sialagogue. Like a desert traveler, it's important to be prepared for the challenges and have a plan for addressing them.

Individualized Treatment for Xerostomia in pSS

This research emphasizes the need for an individualized approach to the treatment of xerostomia in pSS. By carefully considering the tolerability, side effects, and potential for therapeutic failure of available sialagogues, clinicians can optimize treatment plans for individual patients. It's like navigating a desert – you need to choose the right route and be prepared for the challenges along the way.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides a valuable comparison of pilocarpine and cevimeline for xerostomia in pSS, highlighting their effectiveness, tolerability, and potential limitations. It underscores the importance of individualizing treatment approaches and considering the potential for side effects. It's a reminder that the journey to managing xerostomia in pSS requires a personalized approach, taking into account the unique needs and challenges of each patient.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2014-10-07
  2. Date Revised 2022-03-16
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

25065774

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

7471

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.