Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Home-based versus clinic-based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.

Author: Angel-MüllerEdith, Aponte-GonzalezJohanna, Fajardo-BernalLuisa, GaitánHernando G, LowNicola, RinconCarlos, VigilPatrick

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

Chlamydia and gonorrhea are common sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Improving the process of getting people diagnosed and treated for these infections could help control the spread of STIs and reduce complications from untreated or incompletely treated infections.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are the most frequent causes of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Management strategies that reduce losses in the clinical pathway from infection to cure might improve STI control and reduce complications resulting from lack o...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666088/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Optimizing Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Management: Home-Based Specimen Collection

This research explores the potential of home-based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections. The study examines the effectiveness of home-based specimen collection compared to clinic-based collection for improving STI control and reducing complications. This research highlights the importance of convenient and accessible testing and treatment strategies for STIs.

Breaking Down Barriers to STI Care

The study finds that home-based specimen collection can be an effective strategy for improving STI control and reducing complications. By removing barriers to testing, home-based collection can increase access to care and encourage individuals to seek testing and treatment. This research encourages the adoption of innovative approaches to improve the management of STIs and promote public health.

Making STI Testing More Accessible

This research emphasizes the importance of making STI testing more accessible and convenient. Just as a camel adapts to its desert environment, we must adapt our healthcare systems to make STI testing more readily available. This research encourages the development of innovative solutions like home-based specimen collection to improve STI management and protect public health.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research underscores the importance of innovative approaches to STI management. Just as a camel adapts to its desert environment, we must adapt our healthcare systems to make STI testing and treatment more accessible. This research encourages the adoption of strategies like home-based specimen collection to improve public health and break down barriers to care.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2016-03-31
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

26418128

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC8666088

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.