Ethical and legal issues in cross-system practice in India: Past, present and future.

Author: KumarNaveen C, MathSuresh Bada, MoirangthemSydney, NirmalaMaria Christine

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Recent changes in policies allowing practitioners of Ayurveda, Yoga, Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy (AYUSH) to integrate into the mainstream of healthcare and also allowing practitioners of Ayurveda and Homoeopathy to perform medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) under the proposed amen...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27294458

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Navigating the Complex Terrain of Cross-System Practice in India

This research explores the ethical and legal issues surrounding cross-system practice in India. In this context, cross-system practice refers to the integration of traditional medical practices like Ayurveda with mainstream healthcare. The authors examine the current state of cross-system practice, considering its historical context and legal ramifications. They highlight the complexities surrounding the regulation of cross-system practice and its potential for medical negligence. The authors argue for the need to regulate cross-system practice to ensure patient safety and ethical considerations.

A Crossroads of Tradition and Modernity

In India, where traditional medical practices like Ayurveda have a rich history, the integration of these systems with modern medicine presents a unique challenge. This is like the crossroads of two ancient trade routes – one leading to the bustling marketplace of modern medicine, and the other to the quieter, more traditional route of Ayurveda. The authors argue that this meeting point requires careful navigation to avoid potential pitfalls.

The Need for Clarity and Regulation

The authors call for a more transparent and regulated approach to cross-system practice. This is important to ensure that patients receive safe and effective healthcare. The authors' argument is similar to the need for well-maintained and clear signposts at a crossroads. These signposts help travelers navigate safely and choose the appropriate path. Likewise, clear regulations and guidelines are needed to guide practitioners and ensure patient safety in the realm of cross-system practice.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

The authors advocate for a careful and regulated approach to cross-system practice in India, recognizing its potential benefits while addressing the need to protect patient safety and ethical considerations. Just like a camel navigates a complex and changing landscape, this research encourages a thoughtful approach to navigate the complex terrain of cross-system practice, ensuring that patients receive the best possible healthcare.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2016-08-02
  2. Date Revised 2016-06-14
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

27294458

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

27294458

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.