Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections with posaconazole or itraconazole in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes undergoing intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy: A real-world comparison.
Author: AmatPaula, CalabuigMarisa, Hernández-BoludaJuan Carlos, NavarroDavid, Pérez-MartínezAriadna, SolanoCarlos, TormoMar
Original Abstract of the Article :
This is an observational-retrospective study comparing the real-world outcomes associated with posaconazole vs itraconazole as prophylaxis treatments. Two hundred and ninety-three patient admissions attributable to 174 patients were included in the study. Patients were treated with itraconazole (n =...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.12728
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Primary Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections with Posaconazole or Itraconazole in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Undergoing Intensive Cytotoxic Chemotherapy: A Real-World Comparison
The world of [invasive fungal infections] can be as treacherous as a sandstorm. This study explores the effectiveness of two antifungal medications, [posaconazole] and [itraconazole], in preventing these infections in patients with [acute myeloid leukemia (AML)] or [high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)] undergoing intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy. Using a [retrospective observational] design, researchers compared the real-world outcomes of these two antifungal medications.
The study, which included [293 patient admissions] attributable to [174 patients], found that posaconazole was associated with a lower rate of [antifungal prophylaxis failure (APF)] due to [treatment-related adverse events] compared to itraconazole. However, the study found no significant difference in the rate of APF due to [probable/proven breakthrough fungal infection] between the two medications. This study provided real-world evidence to support the use of posaconazole over itraconazole in AML or MDS patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy.
Posaconazole: A More Effective Prophylactic Option
The study’s findings suggest that posaconazole may be a more effective prophylactic option than itraconazole for preventing invasive fungal infections in patients with AML or MDS undergoing intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy. This could have significant implications for the management of these patients, potentially reducing the risk of life-threatening infections.
Implications for Cancer Treatment and Patient Safety
The development of effective prophylactic strategies is crucial for improving the safety and outcomes of cancer treatment. By minimizing the risk of invasive fungal infections, we can improve the well-being and survival of patients with AML or MDS undergoing intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Dr.Camel's Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into the real-world effectiveness of posaconazole and itraconazole in preventing invasive fungal infections in vulnerable patient populations. The findings highlight the importance of careful consideration when selecting antifungal prophylaxis for patients with AML or MDS. By choosing the right medication, we can help protect these patients from the potentially life-threatening complications of fungal infections.
Date :
- Date Completed 2018-10-10
- Date Revised 2018-10-10
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.