Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Bleeding pattern difference between levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine devices inserted immediately post-abortion: a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study in Chinese women.

Author: ChenJing, ChenXiaoning, LiJian, LiQianxi, LuoJianru, LvWen, ShiBin, WangHong, WangXiaoye

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Observational StudyResearch that observes and collects data on participants' behavior and outcomes in their natural state, without intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

The levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) was found to be more effective than the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) in reducing bleeding days and dysmenorrhea after abortion, with a similar safety profile.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: To describe the bleeding pattern (primary outcome), side effects, treatment satisfaction and 6 month continuity rates associated with the 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) inserted immediately after abortion. METHODS: This mul...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2017.1421919

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Post-Abortion Contraception: Comparing LNG-IUS and Cu-IUD

Choosing the right contraceptive method, like selecting the best route through a desert, requires careful consideration of individual needs and preferences. This study compares the bleeding patterns and other outcomes associated with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) inserted immediately after abortion. The researchers, like cartographers mapping different paths, meticulously examine the characteristics of each contraceptive method to help women make informed choices.

LNG-IUS: A Promising Option for Post-Abortion Contraception

The study found that LNG-IUS resulted in significantly fewer bleeding days and a higher amenorrhea rate compared to Cu-IUD. This finding, like discovering a hidden spring in the desert, suggests that LNG-IUS may be a more favorable option for women seeking a contraceptive method that reduces menstrual bleeding and promotes menstrual regularity.

Navigating Contraceptive Choices

This study provides valuable information for women considering post-abortion contraception. It highlights the unique characteristics of LNG-IUS and Cu-IUD, emphasizing the importance of personalized contraceptive choices based on individual needs and preferences.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study offers valuable insights into the bleeding patterns and other outcomes associated with LNG-IUS and Cu-IUD. It suggests that LNG-IUS may be a more suitable option for women seeking a post-abortion contraceptive method that reduces menstrual bleeding and promotes menstrual regularity. It underscores the importance of personalized contraceptive choices based on individual needs and preferences.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-09-10
  2. Date Revised 2019-09-10
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

29298525

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1080/03007995.2017.1421919

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.