A pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people seen after second or subsequent episodes of self-harm: the Self-Harm Intervention - Family Therapy (SHIFT) trial.

Author: BostonPaula, CollinsonMichelle, CottrellDavid J, EislerIvan, FarrinAmanda J, FortuneSarah, GrahamElizabeth H, GreenJonathan, HouseAllan O, KerfootMichael, OwensDavid W, SalonikiEirini-Christina, SimicMima, TubeufSandy, Wright-HughesAlex

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Self-harm in adolescents is common and repetition rates high. There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of interventions to reduce self-harm. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of family therapy (FT) compared with treatment as usual (TAU). DESI...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867393/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Family Therapy: A Potential Compass in the Desert of Self-Harm

Self-harm is a serious and often recurring problem, particularly among adolescents. This study explores the effectiveness of family therapy (FT) in reducing self-harm repetition in young people who have self-harmed at least twice. The researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing FT to treatment as usual (TAU), investigating the impact of FT on self-harm repetition rates, as well as its cost-effectiveness. This study provides valuable insights into the potential benefits and limitations of FT in addressing this complex issue.

Navigating the Challenges of Self-Harm: A Collaborative Approach

The study found no overall difference in self-harm repetition rates between FT and TAU. However, FT showed some benefits in reducing self-harm when caregivers reported poor family functioning. This finding suggests that FT may be most effective when addressing the broader family context of self-harm, emphasizing the importance of a collaborative approach to treatment. It's like having a compass to guide us through the complex desert of self-harm, where a multi-faceted approach is often necessary.

Understanding Self-Harm: A Journey of Compassion and Support

Self-harm is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. This study highlights the importance of understanding the family context and considering the unique needs of each individual. It encourages us to embrace a compassionate and supportive approach, working together to find effective solutions that can help young people break the cycle of self-harm. It's a reminder that navigating the challenging landscape of self-harm requires a collaborative effort, with compassion and support serving as our guiding principles.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study offers a nuanced perspective on the effectiveness of FT in reducing self-harm. It reminds us that a one-size-fits-all approach is rarely effective, and a deeper understanding of the family context is often crucial. It's a reminder that the journey through the desert of self-harm requires a collaborative effort, with compassion and support serving as our guiding principles.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-04-09
  2. Date Revised 2021-01-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

29532784

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC5867393

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.