Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Retraction: Festuccia, C., Gravina, G. L., Angelucci, A., Millimaggi, D., Muzi, P., Vicentini, C. and Bologna, M. (2005), Additive antitumor effects of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib (Iressa), and the nonsteroidal antiandrogen, bicalutamide (Casodex), in prostate cancer cells in vitro. Int. J. Cancer, 115: 630-640. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20917.

Author:

Retraction of PublicationThe formal withdrawal of a published article due to errors or problems. Usually, the reason for the retraction is explained.

Overview

This article has been retracted due to the reuse of several figure panels. The authors are unable to confirm the accuracy of the reported results and provide updated figures.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
The above article, published online on 7 February 2005, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal Editor-in-Chief, Prof. Peter Lichter, the Union for International Cancer Control and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The retraction has b...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32130

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Retraction: A Cautionary Tale in the Realm of Scientific Integrity

The world of scientific research is built on a foundation of trust and integrity. This retraction notice highlights the importance of adhering to rigorous ethical standards in scientific publishing. This particular retraction involves the reuse of figure panels, which raises serious concerns about the validity and reliability of the study's findings.

Maintaining Scientific Integrity: A Foundation of Trust

The retraction of this article serves as a stark reminder of the importance of maintaining scientific integrity. Rigorous peer review and ethical standards are essential for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of scientific research. It's like a compass that guides us through the desert of knowledge, ensuring that we stay on the path of truth and accuracy.

The Value of Transparency: Building a Robust Scientific Landscape

This retraction emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in scientific publishing. Retractions, while regrettable, play a crucial role in ensuring the integrity of the scientific record. By openly acknowledging errors and retracting flawed research, we contribute to a more robust and reliable scientific landscape.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This retraction serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us that scientific integrity is paramount. It underscores the importance of rigorous research practices and ethical conduct, ensuring the credibility and reliability of scientific findings. It’s a reminder that even in the vast desert of scientific knowledge, we must always strive for accuracy and truth.

Date :
  1. Date Completed n.d.
  2. Date Revised 2019-11-20
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

31099426

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1002/ijc.32130

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effects of bicalutamide
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.