Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Unwanted Effects within a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group in Comparison with a Recreational Group - a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.
Author: FlögeBianka, LindenMichael, MuschallaBeate
Original Abstract of the Article :
Group interventions can have negative effects for patients with anxiety disorders. Stimuli which provoke side effects may be the group setting, the content, or the interaction between the participants in the group. This study is the first to report negative effects from a cognitive behavioral group ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2020.115
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Unmasking the Unwanted: Negative Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Groups
This study sheds light on the potential negative effects of group interventions for patients with anxiety disorders. It's like a herd of camels in the desert, where individual camels might react differently to the group dynamics and social interactions. The study found that certain aspects of the group setting, content, or even the interactions between participants can trigger unwanted side effects.Group Therapy: A Double-Edged Sword
The study revealed that a cognitive behavioral therapy group intervention can have negative effects compared to a recreational group. This is a reminder that group therapy, while often beneficial, isn't a one-size-fits-all solution. Just as a camel caravan must navigate treacherous terrain, anxiety patients might struggle with the demands of group therapy and experience unexpected challenges.Finding the Right Oasis: Tailoring Therapy to Individual Needs
This study emphasizes the importance of carefully considering the individual needs and sensitivities of anxiety patients when choosing a therapeutic approach. Like finding the best watering hole in the desert, finding the right therapy for each patient is crucial. This might involve individual therapy, smaller group settings, or alternative forms of treatment. The key is to choose a path that leads to healing and well-being, rather than unexpected challenges.Dr.Camel's Conclusion
The study highlights a potential downside to group therapy, demonstrating that it can have negative effects on certain anxiety patients. This reinforces the need to personalize therapeutic approaches, like finding the perfect oasis for each camel in the desert. By understanding the unique needs of individuals, we can create a therapeutic journey that leads to healing and well-being.Date :
- Date Completed 2020-04-22
- Date Revised 2020-04-22
Further Info :
Related Literature
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages
English
Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.