Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to describe the rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic urinary retention and catheterization in women undergoing initial intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA (BnTA) injection for urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). METHODS: This retrospective chart review included women...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000847

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection: Rates of Urinary Retention in Women with Urgency Incontinence

Urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) is a common condition affecting women, causing an uncontrollable urge to urinate. This study examines the rates of urinary retention in women undergoing initial intravesical injections of onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) for UUI. The researchers retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women who had received an initial injection of BoNTA, focusing on the incidence of both symptomatic and asymptomatic urinary retention, a condition where the bladder is unable to empty completely.

Urinary Retention Following OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection

The study found that urinary retention occurred in 10% of patients who received an initial BoNTA injection, with 8% experiencing symptomatic retention and 2% experiencing asymptomatic retention. The researchers also observed that women who had previously undergone anti-stress urinary incontinence procedures were more likely to experience retention after BoNTA injection.

Understanding the Risks and Benefits of OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection

This study underscores the importance of understanding the potential risks associated with BoNTA injections for UUI, particularly the risk of urinary retention. The findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and close monitoring to minimize the risk of complications. Healthcare providers should discuss the potential risks and benefits of BoNTA injection with patients before treatment to ensure informed decision-making.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

Just like a camel navigating the vast desert with a keen sense of its surroundings, healthcare providers need to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of treatment options like BoNTA injections. This study sheds light on the rates of urinary retention following BoNTA injection, emphasizing the importance of individual risk assessment, close monitoring, and open communication with patients to ensure the best possible outcomes. By understanding the intricacies of treatment choices, we can guide patients towards a healthier and more fulfilling life.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2021-12-03
  2. Date Revised 2021-12-14
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

32487882

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1097/SPV.0000000000000847

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.