Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Standardized Management for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and ARDS: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Author: DoigChristopher J, FiestKirsten M, KnightGwen, Lee RobertsonHelen, NivenDaniel J, ParharKen Kuljit S, RubenfeldGordon D, SooAndrea, StelfoxHenry T, ZuegeDanny J

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

Standardized treatment of patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was associated with increased ventilator-free days, lower tidal volume ventilation, and lower mortality compared to usual care. ICUs should consider using standardized treatment to improve care processes and outcomes for these patients.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and ARDS is complex. Standardized management of HRF and ARDS may improve adherence to evidence-informed practice and improve outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the effect of standardized treatment compared with usual care on survival of...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.611

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Standardizing Care for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and ARDS

Treating hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is like navigating a treacherous sandstorm. The conditions are complex and require a carefully coordinated approach. This research explores the potential benefits of standardized management protocols for these life-threatening respiratory conditions, seeking to optimize care and improve patient outcomes.

A Blueprint for Navigating the Sandstorm

The study analyzed data from 14 clinical trials examining the impact of standardized treatment protocols compared to usual care for patients with HRF and ARDS. The results indicate that standardized management, like having a clear map in the midst of a sandstorm, is associated with improved patient outcomes. Patients receiving standardized care experienced a 23% relative reduction in mortality, along with increased ventilator-free days and lower tidal volume ventilation.

Clearing the Air and Improving Outcomes

The findings strongly suggest that standardized treatment protocols for HRF and ARDS can improve the effectiveness and consistency of care, leading to better patient outcomes. For patients battling these severe respiratory conditions, standardized care provides a roadmap for navigating the treacherous sandstorm and increasing their chances of survival. The study underscores the importance of implementing clear, evidence-based guidelines for critical care, much like having a reliable compass to navigate the complexities of the medical desert.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research offers a beacon of hope in the midst of the challenging landscape of respiratory distress. The evidence clearly points to the potential benefits of standardized treatment for HRF and ARDS. It is encouraging to see research that focuses on optimizing patient care and improving outcomes in critical situations. As a seasoned explorer of the medical desert, I believe that this research marks a significant step forward in improving patient care for those facing life-threatening respiratory conditions.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2021-05-26
  2. Date Revised 2021-05-26
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

32629038

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.611

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of respiratory failure
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.