Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Author: BrownElizabeth, ChuiAnthea C, HuiAndrew J O, Oliver-WilliamsClare, QuenbySiobhan, SiaClifford Y S, WaldockWilliam J, YogasundramHannah M

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Infertility is a global problem, but only a minority of couples access assisted reproductive technologies due to financial and sociocultural barriers. Complementary and alternative medicine are seen as another option. We aimed to determine the impact of complementary and alternative medicine on conc...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960609/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Infertility: A Comprehensive Review

Infertility affects millions of couples worldwide, presenting a significant challenge in their quest to build a family. While assisted reproductive technologies (ART) offer solutions, they are often inaccessible due to financial and sociocultural barriers. This study delves into the world of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), examining its potential impact on fertility outcomes for couples seeking natural conception. The researchers conducted a systematic review, carefully analyzing existing studies to synthesize the evidence surrounding the use of CAM for infertility.

CAM: A Diverse Landscape of Practices

The review explored a wide range of CAM practices, including acupuncture, herbal medicine, and lifestyle modifications. While some studies showed promising results, the evidence was often limited and inconsistent. The researchers concluded that more rigorous research is needed to determine the true effectiveness of CAM for infertility. This emphasizes the importance of critical evaluation of evidence and the need for well-designed studies to provide conclusive answers.

Seeking Evidence-Based Care

This review highlights the importance of seeking evidence-based care when dealing with infertility. While CAM practices may offer potential benefits, it's crucial to approach them with a discerning eye, considering the quality of evidence and potential risks. Always consult with a healthcare professional to discuss your options and make informed decisions based on your individual circumstances.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This review underscores the need for a balanced approach to infertility treatment. While CAM practices offer a diverse landscape of options, more robust research is needed to fully understand their effectiveness. Consulting with a healthcare professional and making informed decisions based on evidence are essential for navigating the challenging path to parenthood.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2021-03-31
  2. Date Revised 2021-10-15
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

33083872

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC7960609

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.