Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Clinical Practice in the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency: A Central and Eastern European Expert Consensus Statement.

Author: BelayaZhanna, BoyanovMihail, DiaconuCamelia C, MokhortTatiana, PayerJuraj, PilzStefan, PludowskiPawel, RasaIngvars, TakacsIstvan, ZherdovaNadiia

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.

Overview

Vitamin D deficiency is common worldwide, but there is no consensus on guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. This study provides recommendations developed by a European expert panel. They recommend testing for vitamin D deficiency in certain risk groups and suggest supplementation doses of 800 to 2000 IU per day for adults to maintain sufficient vitamin D levels. Higher doses of 6000 IU per day may be used for the first 4 to 12 weeks of treatment if a rapid correction of vitamin D deficiency is clinically indicated, followed by a maintenance dose of 800 to 2000 IU per day.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Vitamin D deficiency has a high worldwide prevalence, but actions to improve this public health problem are challenged by the heterogeneity of nutritional and clinical vitamin D guidelines, with respect to the diagnosis and treatment of vitamin D deficiency. We aimed to address this issue by providi...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9002638/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Navigating the Desert of Vitamin D Deficiency

As a researcher who has traversed the vast and often unforgiving desert of vitamin D deficiency, I’m excited to share this new study. It tackles a critical issue in the field: the lack of harmony in vitamin D guidelines across different regions and healthcare systems. This research utilized the Delphi method, a powerful tool for achieving consensus among experts, to create recommendations for adults. Imagine a group of wise, experienced desert travelers sharing their knowledge to guide others through the challenging landscape of vitamin D deficiency.

A Beacon of Hope in the Vitamin D Desert

The study found that while a general screening for vitamin D deficiency may not be necessary, certain risk groups could benefit from 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) testing. Imagine this as a scout searching for signs of trouble, helping to identify those who may need extra support. They recommend a daily vitamin D supplement dose of 800 to 2000 international units (IU) for adults, which is like providing travelers with a reliable source of water to maintain their health and strength.

Staying Hydrated in the Vitamin D Desert

This research suggests that ensuring sufficient vitamin D status can contribute to overall health. The researchers advocate for harmonizing vitamin D guidelines to ensure everyone has access to this essential nutrient. Think of this as creating a map to guide everyone through the vast desert, leading to better health outcomes. This research provides crucial insight for healthcare professionals and individuals, helping them navigate the complex landscape of vitamin D deficiency.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research is a beacon of hope in the desert of vitamin D deficiency, guiding us towards a more consistent and effective approach to maintaining optimal vitamin D levels. By providing clarity and consensus on vitamin D guidelines, this study helps to ensure that everyone has access to the knowledge and tools they need to thrive.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2022-04-13
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-23
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

35406098

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC9002638

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of vitamin d deficiency
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.