Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Management of antithrombotic treatment and bleeding disorders in patients requiring venous access devices: A systematic review and a GAVeCeLT consensus statement.

Author: AnnettaMaria Giuseppina, BertoglioSergio, BiffiRoberto, BresciaFabrizio, GiarrettaIgor, GrecaAntonio La, PanocchiaNicola, PassaroGiovanna, PernaFrancesco, PinelliFulvio, PittirutiMauro, PriscoDomenico, SannaTommaso, ScoppettuoloGiancarlo

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

The Italian Group of Venous Access Devices (GAVeCeLT) developed a consensus on the management of antithrombotic treatment and bleeding disorders in patients requiring venous access devices (VADs). The consensus recommends a classification of VAD-related procedures based on bleeding risk, and outlines appropriate management for patients with bleeding disorders and those on antithrombotic treatment who require VAD insertion/removal. The recommendations are designed to provide a clear and synthetic list for easy translation into clinical practice.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Insertion of venous access devices (VAD) is usually considered a procedure with low risk of bleeding. Nonetheless, insertion of some devices is invasive enough to be associated with bleeding, especially in patients with previous coagulopathy or in treatment with antithrombotic drugs for cardiovascul...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298211072407

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Managing Antithrombotic Treatment and Bleeding Disorders: A Desert of Medical Decisions

Inserting venous access devices (VADs) is a common procedure, like navigating a desert trail, often associated with a low risk of bleeding. However, this study, like a group of experts gathered around a campfire to discuss challenges, delves into the complex management of antithrombotic treatment and bleeding disorders in patients requiring VADs. The researchers acknowledge that the insertion of certain devices can be invasive, increasing the risk of bleeding, especially in patients with pre-existing coagulopathy or those on antithrombotic medication. This study provides evidence-based recommendations to guide clinical practice in this delicate area of medicine, offering a roadmap for managing these complex situations.

Navigating the Terrain: Balancing Blood Clots and Bleeding Risks

This study, like a careful analysis of the desert's ecosystem, examines the delicate balance between preventing blood clots and minimizing the risk of bleeding in patients requiring VADs. The researchers provide detailed guidance on the appropriate management of patients with bleeding disorders or those on antithrombotic treatment, offering a framework for making informed decisions about patient care.

A Path to Safety: Prioritizing Patient Well-being

This study, like a beacon guiding a caravan through a challenging desert landscape, offers a path to safety and well-being for patients requiring VADs. By providing evidence-based recommendations for managing antithrombotic treatment and bleeding disorders, this study empowers healthcare providers to make informed decisions that prioritize patient safety and minimize potential risks.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study serves as a valuable resource for healthcare providers, offering a comprehensive guide to managing antithrombotic treatment and bleeding disorders in patients requiring VADs. By understanding the complexities of these conditions and implementing evidence-based practices, we can navigate the desert of medical decisions with greater precision, ensuring the best possible outcomes for our patients.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2022-07-06
  2. Date Revised 2022-07-06
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

35533088

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1177/11297298211072407

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of bleeding disorders
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.