Balloon pulmonary angioplasty versus riociguat in inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (MR BPA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Author: AbeKohtaro, FukudaKeiichi, HirataKenichi, HosokawaKazuya, JinzakiMasahiro, KataokaMasaharu, KawakamiTakashi, KohsakaShun, MatsubaraHiromi, MurataMitsushige, OgawaAiko, SatoYasunori, ShimokawaharaHiroto, ShinkeToshiro, TaniguchiYu, TsutsuiHiroyuki, YamadaYoshitake

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Treatment options for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension ineligible for pulmonary endarterectomy (inoperable CTEPH) include balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and riociguat. However, these two treatment options have not been compared prospectively. We aimed to compare the s...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00171-0

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Treating Inoperable CTEPH: A Comparative Trial of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a serious condition that can significantly impact quality of life. This open-label, randomized controlled trial compares two treatment options for patients with inoperable CTEPH: balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and riociguat. The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these two approaches, providing valuable insights for clinicians managing patients with this challenging condition.

A Comparative Look at Treatment Options

This study provides a direct comparison of BPA and riociguat in patients with inoperable CTEPH. The study's findings will contribute to a more informed decision-making process for clinicians managing patients with this condition. The study's rigorous design and open-label nature provide valuable data for evaluating the relative merits of these two treatment approaches.

Navigating the Treatment Landscape for Inoperable CTEPH

This study highlights the complexities of managing inoperable CTEPH. The study's findings will provide valuable guidance for clinicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment option for their patients. The research underscores the importance of considering individual patient characteristics and goals when making treatment decisions.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This comparative trial offers a valuable contribution to the understanding and management of inoperable CTEPH. The study's findings provide clinicians with important data to inform their treatment decisions, offering a more personalized approach to managing this challenging condition. The journey to better health is a continuous one, and ongoing research is essential to identify the most effective treatments for individuals facing this condition.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2022-10-04
  2. Date Revised 2022-11-15
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

35926544

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00171-0

Related Literature

Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.