Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Cost-effectiveness of vibegron for the treatment of overactive bladder in the United States.
Author: ChenJing Voon, KleinTimothy M, MuddPaul N, NesheimJeffrey
Original Abstract of the Article :
AIMS: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vibegron compared with other oral pharmacologic therapies as treatment for overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: A semi-Markov model with monthly cycles was developed to support a lifetime horizon of vibegron 75 mg from a US commercial payor or Medicare pers...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2022.2115754
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Vibegron: A Cost-Effective Treatment for Overactive Bladder?
In the vast and ever-expanding desert of medical research, we are constantly searching for oases of effective and affordable treatments. This study, like a shimmering mirage, explores the cost-effectiveness of vibegron for overactive bladder (OAB), a condition that can be as disruptive as a sandstorm in your life. The study, conducted from a US commercial payor or Medicare perspective, employed a semi-Markov model to simulate a lifetime horizon of vibegron 75 mg treatment.
The researchers evaluated vibegron against other oral pharmacologic therapies, considering factors such as efficacy (reductions in urination frequency and incontinence episodes), adverse events, comorbidities, drug-drug interactions, and treatment persistence. Their findings suggest that vibegron was cost-effective compared to mirabegron and an anticholinergic basket, demonstrating that vibegron may be a cost-effective treatment for OAB.
The Cost-Effectiveness of Vibegron: A Promising Oasis in the Desert of Treatment Options
The study's results, based on various cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), indicated that vibegron was cost-effective compared to other treatments for OAB. The researchers also performed sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of their findings. These analyses showed that vibegron's cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to its persistence at 1 and 12 months, suggesting that longer-term persistence of treatment is crucial to maximizing cost-effectiveness.
Navigating the Sands of Treatment: Implications for Health and Well-Being
This study provides valuable information for individuals seeking treatment for OAB, as well as for healthcare providers making decisions about drug selection. The findings suggest that vibegron might be a viable and cost-effective option for many patients, especially considering the potential for long-term persistence of treatment. However, as with any medical intervention, consulting with a healthcare professional to determine the best course of treatment is crucial.
Dr. Camel's Conclusion
In the vast desert of healthcare options, this study offers a promising oasis of cost-effectiveness for vibegron in treating OAB. However, it's crucial to remember that every camel is unique. What might work for one may not work for another. Just like a camel navigating the shifting sands, finding the right treatment requires a personalized approach and guidance from a trusted healthcare professional.
Date :
- Date Completed 2022-09-12
- Date Revised 2022-09-12
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.