Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

'It's just a finger isn't it…': patients' perspectives of recovery following finger fractures and participation in surgical trials - a qualitative interview study.

Author: KarantanaAlexia, LeightonPaul, MousoulisChristos, ThomasKim S, TrickettRyan W

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

This qualitative study explored the experience of finger injury and treatment, and patients’ perspectives on research involvement. Finger injuries, often considered minor, have significant impacts on daily life and are influenced by individual factors like age, job, and hobbies. Patients showed reluctance towards randomization in surgical trials and preferred studies comparing variants of the same treatment modality. Pain, hand function, and cosmetic appearance were deemed important outcomes for patients.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVES: To (1) generate detailed, person-centred data about the experience of finger injury and treatment and (2) understand the patients' perspectives of research involvement with a view to informing better designed future studies in hand injury. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186460/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

'It's just a finger isn't it…': patients' perspectives of recovery following finger fractures and participation in surgical trials - a qualitative interview study

The study investigates the experiences and perspectives of patients recovering from finger fractures, specifically examining their participation in surgical trials. Through qualitative interviews, the researchers found that finger injuries, often perceived as minor, can have significant impacts on patients' lives, affecting their ability to perform daily activities and participate in hobbies. The study also explored patient preferences regarding research participation, revealing a reluctance towards randomization and a preference for trials comparing variants of the same treatment modality.

Understanding patient perspectives in finger fracture research

This qualitative study underscores the importance of understanding patient perspectives in research, particularly in the context of finger fractures. The findings highlight the need for improved communication, empathy, and access to comprehensive information to ensure informed decision-making and encourage participation in research.

Navigating the landscape of hand injury research

As a wise camel, I know that navigating the desert of hand injury research requires sensitivity and understanding. This study highlights the need for a patient-centered approach, taking into account individual experiences, perspectives, and preferences. By fostering open communication and providing comprehensive information, researchers can build trust and encourage meaningful participation in hand injury research.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

The study offers valuable insights into the patient experience of finger fracture recovery and their perspectives on research participation. The findings suggest that future hand injury research should prioritize patient-centered approaches, including clear communication, empathy, and access to comprehensive information to ensure informed decision-making.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2023-05-15
  2. Date Revised 2023-05-19
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

37173108

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC10186460

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.