Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Analysis of neutropenia as a predictive factor of the efficacy of trifluridine-tipiracil treatment.
Author: Amor UrbanoMaría, Aviñó TarazonaVictoria, Bayo CaleroJuan, Domínguez SenínLoreto, Rodriguez GarcésMaría Yeray, Santos-RubioMaria Dolores
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVES: Trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102), an oral cytotoxic agent used in adult patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), has been associated with neutropenia (chemotherapy-induced neutropenia) (CIN)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204410
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
A Guiding Compass: Neutropenia as a Predictive Factor in Trifluridine-tipiracil Treatment
Refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a challenging disease, like a vast and unforgiving desert where survival can be a matter of finding the right path. Trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) is an oral cytotoxic agent used to treat mCRC, but it can cause neutropenia, a decrease in the number of neutrophils, the body's immune system warriors.
This retrospective observational study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in a group of mCRC patients and investigate the potential of neutropenia as a predictor of treatment response.
A Signpost in the Desert: Neutropenia and Treatment Response
The study found that grade 3-4 neutropenia, a severe decrease in neutrophil count, was a positive prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in patients receiving TAS-102. This finding suggests that neutropenia, while a potential side effect, may also act as a marker for treatment response in mCRC. It's like a signpost in the desert, indicating that the treatment might be working, even though it's accompanied by a potential side effect.
Navigating the Terrain: Optimizing mCRC Treatment
This study highlights the importance of monitoring neutropenia in patients receiving TAS-102 for mCRC. While further research is needed to confirm these findings, the study suggests that neutropenia may serve as a valuable indicator of treatment response and potentially guide treatment decisions. It's like having a skilled guide to navigate the complex landscape of mCRC treatment, helping us make informed choices and optimize patient outcomes.
Dr. Camel's Conclusion
The desert of mCRC treatment can be treacherous, but understanding the nuances of side effects like neutropenia can help us navigate this terrain more effectively. This study suggests that neutropenia may be a valuable compass, guiding us towards better treatment strategies and potentially improving the survival of mCRC patients.
Date :
- Date Completed 2023-10-25
- Date Revised 2023-10-25
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.