Dexamethasone-sparing regimens with NEPA (netupitant/palonosetron) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in older patients (>65 years) fit for cisplatin: A sub-analysis from a phase 3 study.

Author: AaproMatti, BartschRupert, CelioLuigi

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
We recently demonstrated the non-inferiority of two dexamethasone (DEX)-sparing regimens with an oral fixed-combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA) versus the guideline-recommended DEX use for cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Since prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiti...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101537

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Dexamethasone-Sparing Regimens for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Easing the Desert Journey

Chemotherapy is a powerful weapon in the fight against cancer, but it often comes with challenging side effects, one of which is chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This study explores the potential of dexamethasone (DEX)-sparing regimens, using a fixed-combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA), to mitigate these distressing side effects in older patients.

The researchers, like explorers navigating a difficult terrain, conducted a phase 3 study to compare the efficacy of DEX-sparing regimens with NEPA to the standard guideline-recommended DEX use in patients receiving cisplatin. They meticulously analyzed the data to determine whether NEPA could effectively prevent CINV while reducing the need for DEX, a corticosteroid with potential side effects.

NEPA: A Potential Oasis for Reducing CINV

The findings of this study suggest that NEPA holds promise as a DEX-sparing regimen for preventing CINV in older patients. The results indicated that NEPA was non-inferior to DEX in terms of efficacy, offering a potential alternative for reducing the need for corticosteroids. It's like discovering a new oasis in the desert, offering relief from the harsh side effects of traditional treatments.

Navigating the Side Effects of Cancer Treatment

This research is a testament to the ongoing efforts to improve the quality of life for cancer patients, seeking to minimize the discomfort and side effects associated with treatment. While NEPA shows promising results, further research is needed to fully understand its long-term effects and its potential benefits across diverse patient populations. Navigating the desert of cancer treatment is a challenging journey, and we must continue to search for new solutions that enhance patient well-being.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study offers a potential respite from the harsh side effects of chemotherapy, like finding a cool spring in a scorching desert. It's a testament to the ingenuity of researchers who are continuously striving to improve the experience of cancer patients. However, it's important to acknowledge that the journey through cancer treatment is complex and multifaceted, and we must continue to seek solutions that address the needs of every patient.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2023-07-10
  2. Date Revised 2023-11-16
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

37290207

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101537

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.