The creation of therapeutic orphans--or, what have we learnt from the Debendox fiasco?

Author: BatagolR, SheffieldL J

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
The drug combination Debendox has been very widely used for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Recently its manufacturer ceased world-wide production owing to the increasing costs of litigation associated with claims of teratogenicity. Teratogenicity claims were widespread in the med...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1985.tb122871.x

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Debendox: A Tale of Misinformation and the Importance of Evidence-Based Medicine

This article examines the controversy surrounding Debendox, a drug combination that was widely used for treating nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. It's like uncovering a hidden chapter in the history of desert medicine, exploring the consequences of misinformation and the importance of evidence-based practice. The article reviews the literature and evaluates the claims of teratogenicity, concluding that Debendox was not in fact teratogenic.

Debendox: A Case for Critical Evaluation of Scientific Evidence

The article highlights the importance of critically evaluating scientific evidence and separating fact from fiction. It's like navigating a desert landscape filled with mirages and illusions, requiring careful observation and critical thinking. The article's findings demonstrate the need for responsible and evidence-based decision-making in medicine, especially when dealing with sensitive topics like pregnancy and potential teratogenic effects.

Navigating the Desert of Medical Information: A Guide for Professionals and Patients

This article serves as a valuable reminder for medical professionals and patients alike to rely on sound scientific evidence when making treatment decisions. It's like having a trusted guide in the desert, providing direction and ensuring a safe and informed journey. The article emphasizes the importance of critical thinking, evidence-based practice, and responsible communication in the field of medicine.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This article provides a cautionary tale about the dangers of misinformation and the importance of evidence-based medicine. It's like a reminder to be cautious when navigating the desert of medical information, always seeking out reliable sources and critical thinking. The article underscores the need for responsible and evidence-based decision-making in medicine, protecting the health and well-being of patients and ensuring the integrity of the medical profession.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1985-09-19
  2. Date Revised 2021-01-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

3927122

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.5694/j.1326-5377.1985.tb122871.x

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.