Antiarrhythmic effects of L-penbutolol and DL-propranolol. Comparison of the effects of these two drugs on conductivity and excitability in canine heart in vivo.

Author: NimiN, OhnoM, SugenoyaJ, SugiyamaS, ToyamaJ, YamadaK

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
The effects of l-penbutolol and dl-propranolol on A-V conduction, on excitability of ventricular muscle, and on ventricular tachycardia threshold in acute ischemia were compared, using anesthetized dogs. 1. L-penbutolol (100 microgram/Kg) and dl-propranolol (100 microgram/Kg) prolonged A-V conductio...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/501926

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Antiarrhythmic Effects of Beta-Blockers

This study compares the antiarrhythmic effects of two beta-blockers, L-penbutolol and DL-propranolol, on canine hearts in vivo. The researchers investigated the effects of these drugs on A-V conduction, ventricular muscle excitability, and ventricular tachycardia threshold in acute ischemia. The study found that both drugs effectively prolonged A-V conduction, reduced excitability, and prevented the lowering of ventricular tachycardia threshold. However, L-penbutolol had a weaker effect on A-V conduction compared to DL-propranolol, suggesting potential advantages in terms of safety and efficacy.

Beta-Blockers: A Powerful Tool for Arrhythmia Management

This study highlights the effectiveness of beta-blockers in managing arrhythmias. The findings underscore the role of these drugs in controlling heart rate, reducing excitability, and improving A-V conduction. The study suggests that L-penbutolol, with its weaker effect on A-V conduction, could be a safer and potentially more effective option for certain patients.

The Importance of Personalized Medicine

This research reinforces the importance of a personalized approach to medicine. The study found that while both beta-blockers showed beneficial effects, L-penbutolol appeared to be a safer alternative for certain patients due to its weaker effect on A-V conduction. This highlights the need for tailoring treatment plans to individual patient needs and risk factors.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study, like a camel choosing a safe path through a treacherous desert, compares the antiarrhythmic effects of two beta-blockers. The research highlights the effectiveness of these drugs in managing arrhythmias and underscores the importance of personalized medicine in selecting the most appropriate therapy for each individual. Just as a camel relies on its experience and instincts to navigate the desert, healthcare professionals must rely on a thorough understanding of individual patient needs to guide treatment decisions.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1980-01-24
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

501926

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

501926

Related Literature

Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.