Auriculotherapy fails to relieve chronic pain. A controlled crossover study.

Author: KatzJ, MelzackR

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Enthusiastic reports of the effectiveness of electrical stimulation of the outer ear for the relief of pain ("auriculotherapy") have led to increasing use of the procedure. In the present study, auriculotherapy was evaluated in 36 patients suffering from chronic pain, using a controlled crossover de...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6363735

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Auriculotherapy: A Myth Debunked?

Alternative therapies, such as auriculotherapy, have gained popularity in recent years. However, it is crucial to evaluate the scientific evidence behind these therapies to ensure they are safe and effective. This study examines the effectiveness of auriculotherapy for the relief of chronic pain. The authors conducted a controlled crossover study in patients suffering from chronic pain, comparing the effects of stimulating specific points on the outer ear with stimulating control points or no stimulation. The researchers carefully measured pain levels using the McGill Pain Questionnaire to assess the effectiveness of auriculotherapy.

Evaluating Alternative Therapies: A Need for Rigorous Research

The study's findings challenge the widely held belief that auriculotherapy is an effective treatment for chronic pain. The authors found no significant differences in pain relief scores between the auriculotherapy group, the control group, and the placebo group. These results suggest that auriculotherapy may not be a reliable or effective treatment for chronic pain. This study highlights the importance of rigorous scientific research in evaluating alternative therapies to ensure they are safe and effective for patients.

Critical Thinking and Evidence-Based Medicine: Guiding Healthcare Decisions

This research reinforces the importance of critical thinking and evidence-based medicine in making healthcare decisions. While alternative therapies may be appealing, it is essential to evaluate their effectiveness and safety through rigorous scientific investigation. Patients should consult with healthcare providers who are knowledgeable about evidence-based medicine and can provide informed guidance on treatment options.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study reminds us that the desert of healthcare is full of mirages and false promises. While alternative therapies may seem alluring, it's crucial to rely on evidence-based medicine to make informed decisions about our health. This research encourages us to be discerning consumers of healthcare information and to seek evidence-based treatments that are supported by rigorous scientific studies.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1984-03-23
  2. Date Revised 2016-10-17
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

6363735

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

6363735

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.