Cumulative dose-response study comparing terbutaline pressurized aerosol administered via a pearshaped spacer and terbutaline in a nebulized solution.

Author: BundgaardA, HidingerK G, MadsenE B

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
The bronchodilator effects of cumulative doses of terbutaline 0.125 mg, 0.125 mg and 0.250 mg administered as a pressurized aerosol via a pear shaped spacer were compared with those of terbutaline 1.25 mg, 1.25 mg and 2.50 mg administered as a nebulized solution via a PARI-inhaler Boy. FEV1.0 and fl...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061373

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Comparing Terbutaline Delivery Methods: Pressurized Aerosol vs. Nebulized Solution

The field of [Pulmonary Medicine] focuses on finding [effective and efficient treatments] for [respiratory conditions], such as [asthma]. This research compares the [bronchodilator effects] of [terbutaline], a [common bronchodilator], when administered via [pressurized aerosol with a pear-shaped spacer] versus [nebulized solution]. The authors conducted a [controlled trial] to assess the [pulmonary function] of [13 patients] after receiving [cumulative doses] of [terbutaline] through both delivery methods. Their findings suggest that [both methods were effective in improving pulmonary function], but [no significant advantage] was observed for [nebulized terbutaline] over [pressurized aerosol with a spacer].

Exploring Optimal Terbutaline Delivery: A Matter of Choice

This research offers valuable insights into the [comparative efficacy] of [different delivery methods] for [terbutaline]. While [both methods] demonstrated [similar bronchodilator effects], [the choice of delivery method] may depend on [individual patient factors] and [clinical preferences].

Managing Asthma: A Personalized Approach

The management of [asthma] requires a [personalized approach] that takes into account [individual patient needs] and [symptom severity]. [Regular monitoring], [medication adherence], and [early intervention] are crucial for [controlling asthma symptoms] and [preventing exacerbations]. This study emphasizes the importance of [considering all available treatment options] and working closely with a [physician] to [determine the best treatment plan] for you.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research is like a caravan choosing its route across the desert. Both routes, using pressurized aerosol or nebulized solution, lead to the same destination of improved lung function. However, the choice between these methods may depend on the individual traveler's preferences and the terrain they're navigating.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1982-12-16
  2. Date Revised 2019-08-13
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

7128670

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1007/BF01061373

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.