Effective treatment of adhesions: A Synthesis of Findings from 13 Studies
- Home
- Effective treatment of adhesions
This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.
This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effective treatment of adhesions: A Synthesis of Findings from 13 Studies", please consult your doctor.
For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to DatasetPlease check the disclaimer.
Major Research Findings
Intrauterine adhesions (IUA), also known as Asherman's syndrome, are scar tissue that forms inside the uterus. 4 found that IUAs can develop after a procedure called open myomectomy, which involves removing fibroids from the uterus. This study showed that IUAs after open myomectomy were associated with a lower pregnancy rate compared to IUAs following uterine trauma caused by instruments used during a termination of pregnancy or spontaneous miscarriage. IUA can also form after abdominal surgeries, occurring in 70-90% of patients, and can lead to complications such as adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO), chronic pain, infertility, and difficulties during reoperations. 5 ASBO is a serious condition requiring hospital readmission and reoperation in 30-50% of cases, often with a high risk of recurrence. 5 6 compared the effectiveness of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices for treating IUAs after transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA), a procedure that removes the adhesions. 7 focused on the treatment of vulvovaginal agglutination, a condition involving adhesion of the labia, using a standard protocol that includes dilator placement during surgery and post-operative intravaginal steroid use. 8 explored the use of capsular spacers to treat and prevent the recurrence of adhesions after hip arthroscopic surgery. 9 evaluated the effectiveness of arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (ALA) for post-traumatic knee arthrofibrosis, a condition that affects knee function and movement. 10 investigated the potential of electrical stimulation combined with ultrasound acupuncture therapy to prevent the recurrence of IUAs and improve reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic surgery. 11 compared the effectiveness and safety of two different types of intrauterine stents with varying thickness and hardness in treating moderate to severe IUAs.
Treatment Summary
The main treatment for IUAs is hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, a procedure that removes the adhesions. 4 , 11 , 10 For adhesions after abdominal surgery, the use of adhesion barriers during surgery can reduce the risk of recurrence. 5 Other treatments for IUAs include intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices. 6 . For vulvovaginal agglutination, a standard protocol involving dilator placement during surgery and post-operative intravaginal steroid use has been found effective. 7 8 explores the use of capsular spacers to treat and prevent the recurrence of adhesions after hip arthroscopic surgery. 9 suggests that arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (ALA) can be effective for post-traumatic knee arthrofibrosis.
Benefits and Risks
Benefit Summary
Treatment for adhesions can offer benefits such as pain relief, improved function, and increased chances of pregnancy.
Risk Summary
The treatment of adhesions carries risks such as bleeding, infection, and the possibility of the adhesions returning.
Comparison Across Studies
Commonalities
Many studies consistently show that adhesions can lead to various complications after surgery. Treatment options for adhesions often involve surgical interventions or medication, and the specific approach varies depending on the location and nature of the adhesions.
Differences
Each study focuses on different body regions where adhesions occur, the specific treatment methods, and the patient populations involved.
Consistency and Contradictions in Results
Some research findings show consistency, while others present contradictions. For instance, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis has proven effective for treating IUAs in some studies, but the possibility of reoccurrence has also been reported.
Considerations for Applying Research Findings in Daily Life
When applying research findings to daily life, individual patient circumstances and risks must be carefully considered. Treatments for adhesions can vary significantly based on the individual, so consulting with a physician is crucial.
Limitations of Current Research
The research on adhesions has limitations. Many studies are relatively small, making it unclear whether the findings can be generalized. The mechanisms behind the formation of adhesions and their treatment remain not fully understood.
Future Directions for Research
Further research is necessary for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved in the formation of adhesions and their treatment. Large-scale studies and long-term follow-up investigations are particularly needed.
Conclusion
Adhesions can cause complications after various surgeries, and treatment options vary depending on the individual. Surgical interventions and medication are frequently employed in treating adhesions. When applying research findings in daily life, individual patient conditions and risks should be considered.
The research on adhesions is still evolving, and further studies are essential for advancing our knowledge and improving treatment outcomes.
Treatment List
Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, adhesion barriers, intrauterine balloons, intrauterine contraceptive devices, dilator placement, intravaginal steroid use, capsular spacers,
Benefit Keywords
Risk Keywords
Article Type
Author: BrüggmannDörthe, TchartchianGarri, WallwienerMarkus, MünstedtKarsten, TinnebergHans-Rudolf, HackethalAndreas
Language : English
Author: BosteelsJan, WeyersSteven, KasiusJenneke, BroekmansFrank J, MolBen Willem J, D'HoogheThomas M
Language : English
Author: van den BeukelB A W, de ReeR, van GoorH, van der WalS E I, Ten BroekR P G
Language : English
Author: OkohueJude E, AmehNkeiruka, AdewoleAdebayo
Language : English
Author: Ten BroekRichard P G, TonemanMasja K, van GoorHarry
Language : Dutch
Author: ZhuangLin-Lin, WangKai, ShenHai-Lan, LinJia-Hui, LuYe, LuoZhen-Yu, WangWen-Rong
Language : English
Author: RussellColin B, WelchKathryn C, SaundersNatalie A, HaefnerHope K, SchmidtPayton C
Language : English
Author: RuzbarskyJoseph J, ComfortSpencer M, MartinMaitland D, BriggsKaren K, PhilipponMarc J
Language : English
Author: AbdelghafourKarim M, S ElkalyobyAhmed, H AmerMohammad, AbdelazizM K
Language : English
Author: XuTao, XieLi, QinXiaoling, XieXueting, MoSien, JiangQiu, LiangFeng, ZhuXuehong, LiBin, LinZhong
Language : English
Author: HuangHuan, MaoXuetao, YuYang, XiaoBingxin, ZhaoXingping, ZhangAiqian, XuDabao
Language : English
Author: DescazeaudC, CuvelierG, DescazeaudA, GestinB, RivetA, SaïdaniN
Language : English
Author: FacklerNathan, ChinGarwin, KarasavvidisTheofilos, BohlenHunter, SmithEric, AmirhekmatArya, WangDean
Language : English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.