This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effective treatment of anal cancer: A Synthesis of Findings from 19 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effective treatment of anal cancer: A Synthesis of Findings from 19 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to Dataset
Please check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Major research findings

Anal cancer is a rare gastrointestinal tumor, but its incidence is increasing. 9 More than 90% of anal cancers are squamous cell cancers (SCC) and are nearly always associated with human papillomavirus infection. 9 The standard treatment for localized anal cancer is a combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy, known as chemoradiotherapy. 6 14 Chemoraditherapy has significantly improved cancer outcomes and spared patients from the morbidity of colostomy surgery. 6 However, chemoradiotherapy has its own acute and chronic toxicity profile, which has been significantly reduced over the years with the development of advanced radiotherapy techniques. 6 Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is considered to be the primary definitive treatment for anal cancer, with similar survival rates and the potential to reduce acute toxicity compared to 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-RT). 12 The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become increasingly important in anal cancer treatment, playing a crucial role in diagnosis, treatment response assessment, detection of recurrent disease, and evaluation of potential complications. 8 10 The hybrid MRI scanner and radiation therapy linear accelerator (MR-Linac) has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes for anal cancer patients, with improved soft tissue visualization and daily plan adaptation. 7 However, it presents some limitations due to the incorporation of MRI, including longer treatment times and high cost. 7 The emergence of immunotherapy has opened new therapeutic perspectives for the treatment of anal cancer, with new standards of care being established and clinical trials being developed. 13 The InterAACT trial demonstrated that carboplatin plus paclitaxel is the standard of care for advanced disease. 18 For chemorefractory patients, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have shown promising results, regardless of PD-L1 expression. 18

Treatment summary

Treatment for anal cancer is tailored based on the stage of the tumor and the patient's individual condition. 9 For localized disease, chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care, combining radiation therapy and chemotherapy with mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil. 14 IMRT is increasingly preferred as it can reduce acute toxicity compared to 3D-RT. 12 Surgery may be considered for cases where chemoradiotherapy is ineffective or in cases of recurrence. 6 For advanced disease, systemic chemotherapy is often used, with carboplatin plus paclitaxel being the current standard of care. 18 Immunotherapy is showing promise as a new treatment modality for anal cancer. 13 18

Benefits and risks

Benefit summary

Chemoraditherapy has significantly improved cancer outcomes and spared patients from the morbidity of colostomy surgery. 6 IMRT is considered to be the primary definitive treatment for anal cancer, with similar survival rates and the potential to reduce acute toxicity compared to 3D-RT. 12 Immunotherapy is showing promise as a new treatment modality for anal cancer, with new standards of care being established and clinical trials being developed. 13 The InterAACT trial demonstrated that carboplatin plus paclitaxel is the standard of care for advanced disease. 18 For chemorefractory patients, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have shown promising results, regardless of PD-L1 expression. 18

Risk summary

Chemoraditherapy can have side effects such as nausea, diarrhea, and skin irritation. 6 Long-term side effects include cystitis, proctitis, and sexual dysfunction. 6 Surgery carries risks such as infection and bleeding. 6 Immunotherapy can lead to side effects such as fatigue, fever, and skin rash. 13 18

Comparison between studies

Similarities between studies

Several studies have shown that chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for anal cancer. 6 11 12 14 The use of MRI has become increasingly important in anal cancer treatment, playing a crucial role in diagnosis, treatment response assessment, detection of recurrent disease, and evaluation of potential complications. 8 10 Treatment for anal cancer is tailored based on the stage of the tumor and the patient's individual condition. 9

Differences between studies

A planning-based feasibility study demonstrated that MR-Linac is feasible for a subset of patients with anal cancer, providing improved soft tissue visualization and daily plan adaptation. 7 However, the current limitations of the MR-Linac system may not be suitable for patients with large target volumes. 7 The study also revealed that MR-Linac plans have lower monitor units but take longer to deliver compared to VMAT plans. 7 Another study compared the effectiveness of IMRT and 3D-RT for the treatment of anal cancer and found that IMRT had similar survival rates but with the potential to reduce acute toxicity. 12

Consistency and inconsistency of results

There is a consistency across multiple studies that chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for anal cancer. 6 11 12 14 However, the effectiveness of new treatment modalities such as MR-Linac and immunotherapy requires further research. 7 13 18

Points to consider for real-life application

Treatment for anal cancer is tailored based on the stage of the tumor and the patient's individual condition. 9 It is essential to consult with a doctor to discuss the treatment options and choose the most appropriate one.

Limitations of current research

Further research is needed to investigate the effectiveness of new treatment modalities such as MR-Linac and immunotherapy. 7 13 18 Additionally, more research is needed to standardize anal cancer treatment guidelines and improve patient quality of life. 15 16 17

Future research directions

Future research should focus on investigating the effectiveness of new treatment modalities such as MR-Linac and immunotherapy. 7 13 18 Additionally, more research is needed to standardize anal cancer treatment guidelines and improve patient quality of life. 15 16 17

Conclusion

Treatment for anal cancer has significantly advanced in recent years, with chemoradiotherapy being the standard of care. 6 11 12 14 However, new treatment modalities such as MR-Linac and immunotherapy are being developed and further research is needed to explore their potential. 7 13 18 Treatment for anal cancer is tailored based on the stage of the tumor and the patient's individual condition. 9 It is essential to consult with a doctor to discuss the treatment options and choose the most appropriate one.

List of treatments

Chemoraditherapy, surgery, immunotherapy, IMRT, 3D-RT, MR-Linac


Literature analysis of 19 papers
Positive Content
17
Neutral Content
2
Negative Content
0
Article Type
3
0
2
7
19

Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : German


Language : English


Author: VendrelyVéronique, LemanskiClaire, PommierPascal, LE MalicotKarine, SaintAngélique, Rivin Del CampoEleonor, RegnaultPauline, Baba-HamedNabil, RonchinPhilippe, CrehangeGilles, TougeronDavid, Menager-TabourelElodie, DiazOlivia, HummelsbergerMichael, MinsatMathieu, DrouetFranck, LarrouyAnne, PeiffertDidier, LievreAstrid, ZasadnyXavier, HautefeuilleVincent, MornexFrançoise, LepageCôme, QueroLaurent,


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.