Effective treatment of evaluating health information: A Synthesis of Findings from 3 Studies

  1. Home
  2. Effective treatment of evaluating health information
This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effective treatment of evaluating health information: A Synthesis of Findings from 3 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effective treatment of evaluating health information: A Synthesis of Findings from 3 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to DatasetPlease check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Major Research Findings

Research on educational interventions for low-income individuals with HIV/AIDS explored whether participating in a brief educational intervention using the National Library of Medicine video, Evaluating Health Information: A Tutorial From the National Library of Medicine, would increase electronic health literacy. 2

A study examining how interventions to improve the efficiency of acute stroke care affect prehospital times found that emergency medical services (EMS) call to hospital times have increased in recent years for stroke patients in the UK, which is undesirable due to the relationship between time and effectiveness of reperfusion treatment. 1

A study assessing how health information needs of individuals with colorectal cancer are met across the care continuum revealed that studies evaluating health information needs in colorectal cancer (CRC) lack specificity in terms of study samples involving patients. 3

Treatment Summary

The National Library of Medicine video “Evaluating Health Information: A Tutorial From the National Library of Medicine” used as an educational intervention has the potential to increase electronic health literacy among low-income individuals with HIV/AIDS. 2

Benefits and Risks

Benefit Summary

Increased electronic health literacy may improve self-management strategies for individuals with chronic illnesses. 2

Risk Summary

No risks associated with the educational intervention were identified in this study.

Comparison Between Studies

Commonalities

All three studies focus on health information or health literacy.

Differences

The three studies focus on different diseases and interventions. One study focuses on HIV/AIDS, another on stroke, and the other on colorectal cancer.

Consistency and Contradictions in Results

The HIV/AIDS study provided evidence that educational interventions can contribute to increased electronic health literacy. 2

The stroke study highlighted concerns about increased EMS call to hospital times. 1

The colorectal cancer study pointed out the lack of specificity in terms of study samples involving patients in research on health information needs in colorectal cancer. 3

Considerations for Real-Life Application

The National Library of Medicine video “Evaluating Health Information: A Tutorial From the National Library of Medicine” could be a valuable resource for improving electronic health literacy. 2

Rapid treatment for stroke requires minimizing transport times. 1

To meet the health information needs of individuals with colorectal cancer, more specific research involving patients is required. 3

Limitations of Current Research

The HIV/AIDS study was limited by a small sample size and limited generalizability to specific populations. 2

The stroke study was limited by its focus on specific interventions, neglecting the influence of other factors. 1

The colorectal cancer study was a cross-sectional survey, preventing the inference of causal relationships. 3

Future Research Directions

The HIV/AIDS study requires research with larger sample sizes and improved generalizability to other populations. 2

The stroke study needs research comparing different interventions to examine their impact on transport times. 1

The colorectal cancer study necessitates longitudinal research to track changes over time. 3

Conclusion

Evaluating health information and improving literacy play crucial roles in managing health for individuals with various diseases. 2 1 3

Developing skills to understand and utilize health information empowers individuals to actively participate in their healthcare. Furthermore, healthcare professionals need to comprehend their patients’ health information needs and provide tailored support.

Treatment List

• Educational Intervention 2

• Improving Efficiency of Acute Stroke Care 1

Literature analysis of 3 papers
Positive Content
3
Neutral Content
0
Negative Content
0
Article Type
0
0
1
0
3
1.

How do interventions to improve the efficiency of acute stroke care affect prehospital times? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Author: McClellandGraham, HepburnSarah, FinchTracy, PriceChristopher I

Stroke care efficiency

This review aimed to identify and describe interventions designed to improve the efficiency of acute stroke care, specifically focusing on their impact on ground-based emergency medical services (EMS) call to hospital times.

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Language : English

2.

Do Brief Educational Sessions Increase Electronic Health Literacy of Low-Income Persons Living With HIV/AIDS?

Author: NokesKathleen M, ReyesDarcel M

Increased electronic health literacy

This study explored the effectiveness of a brief educational video in improving electronic health literacy in low-income individuals living with HIV. The video alone was found to increase electronic health literacy.

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.

Language : English

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.