Effective treatment of gastric bypass: A Synthesis of Findings from 38 Studies
- Home
- Effective treatment of gastric bypass
This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.
This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effective treatment of gastric bypass: A Synthesis of Findings from 38 Studies", please consult your doctor.
For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to DatasetPlease check the disclaimer.
Major Research Findings
Numerous studies have shown that gastric bypass surgery is an effective treatment for obesity. 18 compared gastric bypass surgery with adjustable gastric banding and found that both are effective in treating obesity. 9 found that daily use of probiotics after gastric bypass surgery might improve gastrointestinal outcomes. 21 highlighted sleeve gastrectomy as a more popular, simpler, and less morbid alternative to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 25 compared weight loss effectiveness between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass surgery, suggesting that both procedures can lead to long-term weight loss. 22 indicated that probiotics after gastric bypass surgery might alleviate postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms. 37 suggested a possible increased risk of stomach cancer after gastric bypass surgery. 24 compared long-term weight loss between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass, suggesting that gastric bypass might be more effective in achieving long-term weight loss. 3 found that adjustable gastric banding is effective in treating obesity. 6 suggested that weight loss before gastric bypass surgery could lead to better weight loss outcomes after the surgery. 30 investigated the potential of endoscopic treatment for weight regain after gastric bypass surgery. 16 suggested that placing a nonadjustable band around the pouch during gastric bypass might improve weight loss. 27 compared the outcomes and risks of different types of gastric bypass surgery, suggesting that they might have varying weight loss effectiveness and complication risks. 20 provided insights into revisional bariatric surgery, including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. 13 compared the short-term safety and effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass surgery. 12 presented a combination of duodenojejunal bypass and sleeve gastrectomy as a potential alternative to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 15 compared the effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass surgery in treating diabetes. 7 suggested that a low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet after gastric bypass surgery could enhance weight loss. 28 compared weight loss outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 19 highlighted important considerations for treating mood disorders in patients who have undergone intestinal surgery, particularly Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 32 found that revision procedures after initial Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are effective in addressing weight regain. 29 provided insights into the diagnosis and treatment of chronic diarrhea after gastric bypass surgery. 36 suggested that gastric bypass surgery could be a viable treatment option for patients with refractory gastroparesis. 5 highlighted the potential impact of different surgical techniques for gastric bypass on weight loss and complication risk. 4 compared laparoscopic and open gastric bypass surgery. 34 suggested that endoscopic revision of gastrojejunal anastomosis could be an effective treatment for dumping syndrome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 38 investigated various revisional techniques for weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 33 highlighted the challenges in objectively assessing dietary intake and appetite changes after gastric bypass surgery. 31 compared the effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in treating severe obesity in teenagers. 8 assessed the safety and effectiveness of a new transorally introducible stapler system for performing gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 11 reported on endoscopic dilation with an achalasia balloon as a treatment for ring slippage after gastric bypass. 17 compared the long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. 26 outlined the design of a multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing weight loss outcomes for different endoscopic weight loss procedures. 35 investigated different revisional strategies for weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy. 23 compared the quality of life after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, focusing on gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Treatment Summary
Many papers have investigated various treatment methods including gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric banding, and duodenojejunal bypass. 18 compared gastric bypass surgery and adjustable gastric banding. 9 investigated the effectiveness of probiotics after gastric bypass. 21 explored sleeve gastrectomy as an alternative to gastric bypass. 25 compared weight loss outcomes between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass. 22 studied the effectiveness of probiotics after gastric bypass. 24 compared long-term weight loss outcomes between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass. 3 found adjustable gastric banding to be effective in treating obesity. 30 explored endoscopic treatment for weight regain after gastric bypass. 16 investigated the potential of placing a band around the pouch during gastric bypass to improve weight loss. 27 compared the outcomes and risks of different types of gastric bypass surgery. 20 provided insights into revisional bariatric surgery. 12 presented a combination of duodenojejunal bypass and sleeve gastrectomy as a potential alternative to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 5 highlighted the potential impact of different surgical techniques for gastric bypass on weight loss and complication risk. 34 suggested that endoscopic revision of gastrojejunal anastomosis could be an effective treatment for dumping syndrome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 38 investigated various revisional techniques for weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Benefits and Risks
Benefits Summary
Gastric bypass surgery can potentially reduce various health risks associated with obesity. 18 compared gastric bypass surgery and adjustable gastric banding and found both are effective in treating obesity. 21 highlighted sleeve gastrectomy as a more popular, simpler, and less morbid alternative to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 9 suggested that daily use of probiotics after gastric bypass surgery might improve gastrointestinal outcomes. 25 compared weight loss effectiveness between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass surgery, suggesting that both procedures can lead to long-term weight loss. 22 indicated that probiotics after gastric bypass surgery might alleviate postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms. 6 suggested that weight loss before gastric bypass surgery could lead to better weight loss outcomes after the surgery. 28 compared weight loss outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 19 highlighted important considerations for treating mood disorders in patients who have undergone intestinal surgery, particularly Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 31 compared the effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in treating severe obesity in teenagers.
Risks Summary
Gastric bypass surgery involves risks of complications. 37 suggested a possible increased risk of stomach cancer after gastric bypass surgery. 24 compared long-term weight loss between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass, suggesting that gastric bypass might be more effective in achieving long-term weight loss. 30 investigated the potential of endoscopic treatment for weight regain after gastric bypass surgery. 16 suggested that placing a nonadjustable band around the pouch during gastric bypass might improve weight loss. 27 compared the outcomes and risks of different types of gastric bypass surgery, suggesting that they might have varying weight loss effectiveness and complication risks. 20 provided insights into revisional bariatric surgery, including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. 13 compared the short-term safety and effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass surgery. 12 presented a combination of duodenojejunal bypass and sleeve gastrectomy as a potential alternative to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 15 compared the effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass surgery in treating diabetes. 5 highlighted the potential impact of different surgical techniques for gastric bypass on weight loss and complication risk. 4 compared laparoscopic and open gastric bypass surgery. 34 suggested that endoscopic revision of gastrojejunal anastomosis could be an effective treatment for dumping syndrome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 38 investigated various revisional techniques for weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Comparison between Studies
Commonalities between Studies
Numerous studies have consistently found that gastric bypass surgery is an effective treatment for obesity. There is also a common understanding that different surgical techniques may lead to varying weight loss outcomes and complication risks.
Differences between Studies
Studies vary in terms of surgical techniques, comparison groups, study designs, and follow-up periods, leading to diverse findings. Consequently, it is challenging to definitively determine which surgical method is most effective.
Consistency and Contradictions in Results
While many studies demonstrate the effectiveness of gastric bypass surgery in treating obesity, contradictions arise regarding the impact of different surgical techniques on weight loss and complication risks. Moreover, studies have reported issues such as weight regain, insufficient weight loss, and complications following gastric bypass surgery. Therefore, patients should thoroughly understand these risks before considering gastric bypass surgery.
Real-World Application: Important Considerations
While gastric bypass surgery is a viable treatment option for obesity, making the decision to undergo surgery requires careful consideration of individual circumstances. It is crucial to fully comprehend the risks and benefits of the surgery and engage in open discussions with a healthcare professional. Post-surgery, adhering to a suitable dietary and exercise regimen is essential.
Limitations of Current Research
Research on gastric bypass surgery remains limited, particularly regarding its long-term impact. Further research is necessary to better understand long-term effects. Moreover, the effectiveness and risks of surgery can vary based on individual patient factors, such as body composition and lifestyle habits. Thus, more research is needed to address these individual variations.
Future Research Directions
Future research should focus on investigating the long-term impact of gastric bypass surgery, comparing different surgical techniques, and developing personalized treatment approaches based on individual patient characteristics and lifestyle habits. Research exploring the impact of surgery on quality of life and mental health is also crucial.
Conclusion
Gastric bypass surgery is a potentially effective treatment option for obesity. However, it is essential to understand the risks and benefits and have open discussions with a healthcare professional before considering this procedure. Following a tailored dietary and exercise regimen after surgery is crucial for long-term success.
Treatment List
Gastric bypass surgery, adjustable gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, duodenojejunal bypass, probiotics, low-carbohydrate/high-protein diet, endoscopic treatment, revision surgery
Benefit Keywords
Risk Keywords
Article Type
Author: MacLeanL D, RhodeB M, SampalisJ, ForseR A
Language : English
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: a systematic literature review.
Author: ChapmanAndrew E, KiroffGeorge, GamePhilip, FosterBruce, O'BrienPaul, HamJohn, MaddernGuy J
Language : English
Author: LujánJuan A, FrutosM Dolores, HernándezQuiteria, LironRamón, CuencaJose R, ValeroGraciela, ParrillaPascual
Language : English
Author: LeeWei-Jei, YuPo-Jui, WangWeu, ChenTai-Chi, WeiPo-Li, HuangMing-Te
Language : English
Author: AlamiRamzi S, MortonJohn M, SchusterRob, LieJie, SanchezBarry R, PetersAnna, CuretMyriam J
Language : English
Author: SwensonBrian R, Saalwachter SchulmanAlison, EdwardsMelissa J, GrossMeredith P, HedrickTraci L, WeltmanArthur L, NorthrupC Joe, SchirmerBruce D, SawyerRobert G
Language : English
Author: ShangEdward, HasenbergTill, MagdeburgRichard, KeeseMichael, PostStefan, WeinerRudolf
Language : English
Probiotics improve outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a prospective randomized trial.
Author: WoodardGavitt A, EncarnacionBetsy, DowneyJohn R, PerazaJoseph, ChongKaren, Hernandez-BoussardTina, MortonJohn M
Language : English
Author: NguyenNinh T, SloneJohnathan A, NguyenXuan-Mai T, HartmanJaimee S, HoytDavid B
Language : English
Author: CamposJosemberg Marins, EvangelistaLuis Fernando, FerrazAlvaro Antônio B, Galvao NetoManoel P, De MouraEduardo Guimarães H, SakaiPaulo, FerrazEdmundo M
Language : English
Author: RajP Praveen, KumaravelR, ChandramaliteeswaranC, VaithiswaranV, PalaniveluC
Language : English
Author: HelmiöMika, VictorzonMikael, OvaskaJari, LeivonenMarja, JuutiAnne, JaserNabil, PeromaaPipsa, TolonenPekka, HurmeSaija, SalminenPaulina
Language : English
Author: ChronaiouAikaterini, TsoliMarina, KehagiasIoannis, LeotsinidisMichalis, KalfarentzosFotis, AlexandridesTheodore K
Language : English
Author: LiPing, FuPing, ChenJie, WangLiu-Hua, WangDao-Rong
Language : English
Author: HeneghanHelen M, AnnaberdyevShorat, EldarShai, RogulaTomasz, BrethauerStacy, SchauerPhilip
Language : English
Author: LiJian-Fang, LaiDan-Dan, LinZhi-Hong, JiangTian-Ye, ZhangAi-Min, DaiJian-Feng
Language : English
Author: RogersChris A, WelbournRichard, ByrneJames, DonovanJenny L, ReevesBarnaby C, WordsworthSarah, AndrewsRobert, ThompsonJanice L, RoderickPaul, MahonDavid, NobleHamish, KellyJamie, MazzaGraziella, PikeKatie, ParamasivanSangeetha, BlencoweNatalie, PerkinsMary, PorterTanya, BlazebyJane M
Language : English
Author: Lloret-LinaresCélia, BellivierFrank, HeronKyle, BessonMarie
Language : English
Author: MahawarKamal K, GrahamYitka, CarrWilliam R J, JenningsNeil, SchroederNorbert, BalupuriShlok, SmallPeter K
Language : English
Author: ChoJun-Min, KimHyun Jung, Lo MenzoEmanuele, ParkSungsoo, SzomsteinSamuel, RosenthalRaul J
Language : English
Author: ChenJung-Chien, LeeWei-Jei, TsouJun-Juin, LiuTsang-Pai, TsaiPei-Ling
Language : English
Author: BiterL Ulas, van BuurenMichiel M A, MannaertsGuido H H, ApersJan A, DunkelgrünMartin, VijgenGuy H E J
Language : English
Author: SalminenPaulina, HelmiöMika, OvaskaJari, JuutiAnne, LeivonenMarja, Peromaa-HaavistoPipsa, HurmeSaija, SoinioMinna, NuutilaPirjo, VictorzonMikael
Language : English
Author: PeterliRalph, WölnerhanssenBettina Karin, PetersThomas, VetterDiana, KröllDino, BorbélyYves, SchultesBernd, BeglingerChristoph, DreweJürgen, SchiesserMarc, NettPhilipp, BueterMarco
Language : English
Author: HollenbachMarcus, PrettinChristiane, GundlingFelix, ScheppWolfgang, SeufertJochen, SteinJürgen, RöschThomas, AberleJens, FeisthammelJürgen, PetroffDavid, HoffmeisterAlbrecht
Language : English
Author: RobertMaud, EspalieuPhilippe, PelasciniElise, CaiazzoRobert, SterkersAdrien, KhamphommalaLita, PoghosyanTigran, ChevallierJean-Marc, MalherbeVincent, ChouillardElie, RecheFabian, TorciviaAdriana, Maucort-BoulchDelphine, Bin-DorelSylvie, Langlois-JacquesCarole, DelaunayDominique, PattouFrançois, DisseEmmanuel
Language : English
Author: BarrosFernando de, NegrãoMayara Galisse, NegrãoGiovana Galisse
Language : English
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Post-Gastric Bypass Chronic Diarrhea: a Systematic Review.
Author: SollierCamille, BarsamianCharles, BretaultMarion, PoghosyanTigran, RahmiGabriel, ChevallierJean-Marc, BouillotJean-Luc, CaretteClaire, CzernichowSébastien, Rives-LangeClaire
Language : English
Author: de QuadrosLuiz Gustavo, NetoManoel Galvão, MarchesiniJoão Caetano, TeixeiraAndré, GreccoEduardo, JuniorRoberto Luiz Kaiser, ZundelNatan, FilhoIdiberto José Zotarelli, de SouzaThiago Ferreira, FilhoAdmar Concon, da SilvaLyz Bezerra, RamosAlmino Cardoso, FerrazÁlvaro Antônio Bandeira, CamposJosemberg Marins
Language : English
Author: BonouvrieDaniëlle S, BeamishAndrew J, LeclercqWouter K G, van MilEdgar G A H, LuijtenArijan A P M, HazebroekEric J, VreugdenhilAnita C E, OlbersTorsten, van DielenFrançois M H
Language : English
Author: KermansaraviMohammad, Davarpanah JaziAmir Hossein, Shahabi ShahmiriShahab, EghbaliFoolad, ValizadehRohollah, RezvaniMasoud
Language : English
Author: RedpathTamsyn L, LivingstoneM Barbara E, DunneAoibheann A, BoydAdele, le RouxCarel W, SpectorAlan C, PriceRuth K
Language : English
Author: BazarbashiAhmad Najdat, DolanRussell D, McCartyThomas R, JirapinyoPichamol, ThompsonChristopher C
Language : English
Author: FrankenRutger J, SluiterNina R, FrankenJosephine, de VriesRalph, SouvereinDennis, GerdesVitor E A, de BrauwMaurits
Language : English
Author: MascleeGwen M C, KeszthelyiDaniel, ConchilloJosé M, KruimelJoanna W, BouvyNicole D, MascleeAd A M
Language : English
Author: DoukasSotirios G, DoukasPanagiotis G, VageliDimitra P, BroderArkady
Language : English
Author: FrankenRutger J, FrankenJosephine, SluiterNina R, de VriesRalph, EuserSjoerd, GerdesVictor E A, de BrauwMaurits
Language : English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.