This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effective treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding: A Synthesis of Findings from 30 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effective treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding: A Synthesis of Findings from 30 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to Dataset
Please check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Major Research Findings

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency with high mortality rates. Various treatments are used for gastrointestinal bleeding; however, evidence regarding their effectiveness and safety is inadequate. These studies provide diverse insights into treatment methods for gastrointestinal bleeding and their effects.

For example, the study in 5 investigated whether routine early endoscopy benefits patients with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding that stops during hospitalization. The results showed no significant differences in overall hospital deaths, recurrence of bleeding, number of transfusions required to treat recurrent bleeding, deaths after recurrent bleeding, or length of hospital stay between the groups who underwent routine endoscopy and those who did not. This research suggests that early endoscopy may not be essential for patients whose gastrointestinal bleeding has stopped.

The study in 25 suggested that a history of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation taking anticoagulants is associated with an increased risk of subsequent major gastrointestinal bleeding, but not stroke, intracranial bleeding, or all-cause mortality.

The study in 13 concluded that it is unclear whether vitamin K administration for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver disease brings benefits or harms. Additionally, it mentioned that patients with liver disease may require additional interventions to stop bleeding.

The study in 4 indicated that the value of early endoscopy in managing acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is limited. This study found no significant differences in any aspect of patient management or outcome between the groups who received the results of their endoscopy immediately and those who received them after 4 days. Therefore, acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding may naturally resolve without the influence of endoscopy.

The study in 10 explored the potential benefits of administering antifibrinolytic amino acids to patients with liver disease. Patients with liver disease often experience hemostatic abnormalities, such as accelerated fibrinolysis. Therefore, antifibrinolytic amino acids may offer a means to control bleeding.

A network meta-analysis in 21 assessed the value of oral proton pump inhibitors for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The study suggested that oral proton pump inhibitors are as effective as intravenous proton pump inhibitors, with a lower risk of re-operation. Therefore, oral proton pump inhibitors may be an effective option for treating acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

The study in 22 evaluated the efficacy and safety of misoprostol for treating small bowel ulcers and erosions in patients taking low-dose aspirin or NSAIDs who experience obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. The study indicated that misoprostol is effective in treating small bowel ulcers and safe. Therefore, misoprostol may be an effective treatment for patients taking aspirin or NSAIDs who are suspected of having small bowel ulcers causing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

The study in 29 discussed the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors administered before endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The study concluded that the clinical efficacy of proton pump inhibitors administered before endoscopy is inconsistent.

A meta-analysis in 11 compared endoscopic clipping with injection therapy and thermocoagulation for treating non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The study suggested that endoscopic clipping reduces the risk of re-bleeding compared to injection therapy alone and decreases the likelihood of requiring surgery. However, there was no significant difference in re-bleeding or the need for surgery when compared to thermocoagulation.

The study in 19 detailed a planned randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in treating gastrointestinal bleeding. The study highlighted that tranexamic acid might reduce the need for blood transfusions in surgical patients and lower mortality in bleeding trauma patients.

A systematic review in 12 explored the effectiveness of tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The review suggested that tranexamic acid might reduce all-cause mortality. However, due to limitations in the internal and external validity of included trials, additional evidence is necessary before treatment recommendations can be made.

The study in 15 compared the effects of an H2-receptor antagonist (famotidine) and a proton pump inhibitor (omeprazole) administered after endoscopic treatment for bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers. The study suggested that administering either famotidine or omeprazole in the early phase (the first 3 days) is effective in stopping bleeding and preventing its recurrence.

The study in 23 provided guidelines for managing acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. These guidelines suggest that patients identified as very low risk of needing an intervention or death can be managed as outpatients. Furthermore, they outline specific management strategies, such as transfusion criteria, use of medications like proton pump inhibitors and erythromycin, timing of endoscopy, and endoscopic treatment techniques.

The study in 16 investigated the effectiveness of vitamin K administration for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute or chronic liver disease. The study concluded that it is unclear whether vitamin K administration benefits or harms patients with acute or chronic liver disease experiencing upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

The study in 2 compared the effectiveness of ranitidine with standard treatment for acute gastrointestinal bleeding. The study suggested that ranitidine might be superior to standard treatment, particularly for patients with gastric ulcers.

A double-blind controlled trial in 3 evaluated whether cimetidine reduces the severity of bleeding and/or the incidence of re-bleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The study failed to demonstrate any significant advantage of using cimetidine routinely in treating acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

The study in 8 examined the effectiveness of vitamin K administration for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver disease. The study concluded that it is unknown whether vitamin K administration benefits or harms patients with liver disease experiencing upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Additionally, the study suggested that patients with liver disease may require additional interventions to stop bleeding.

A systematic review and meta-analysis in 26 found that resuming anticoagulation after hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding is associated with reduced thromboembolic events and improved mortality.

The study in 14 reviewed the efficacy of argon plasma coagulation therapy for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding compared to other endoscopic therapies. The review concluded that there is no evidence suggesting that argon plasma coagulation is superior to other endoscopic therapies. More randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this treatment.

The study in 17 explored the effectiveness of antifibrinolytic amino acids for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute or chronic liver disease. The study mentioned that patients with liver disease often experience hemostatic abnormalities, such as hyperfibrinolysis. Therefore, antifibrinolytic amino acids may offer a means to control bleeding.

The study in 24 discussed pharmacological interventions for the prevention and treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in newborn infants. The study suggested that pharmacological interventions with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), antacid, bismuth, and sucralfate might have effects on both the prevention and treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in infants.

A systematic review and meta-analysis in 27 assessed the effectiveness of tranexamic acid for gastrointestinal bleeding. The review concluded that extended-use high-dose intravenous tranexamic acid does not improve mortality or bleeding outcomes and increases adverse events. Low-dose intravenous/enteral tranexamic acid might be effective in reducing hemorrhage, but more evidence is needed to demonstrate its safety.

The study in 6 evaluated the effectiveness of drug treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The study found that the amount of blood in the stomach reflects the initial risk, predicts clinical outcomes, and can be reduced by treatment with lansoprazole and tranexamic acid.

A multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized trial in 28 compared a hemostatic powder (TC-325) with standard endoscopic hemostatic treatments for controlling active bleeding from non-variceal upper gastrointestinal causes. The study concluded that TC-325 is not inferior to standard treatment for controlling bleeding from non-variceal upper gastrointestinal causes.

The study in 9 assessed the beneficial and harmful effects of human recombinant activated factor VIIa in patients with liver disease and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The study found no evidence suggesting that human recombinant activated factor VII reduces the risk of death in patients with liver disease and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the study’s conclusion was based on a single randomized clinical trial. More randomized clinical trials with a low risk of bias are necessary to determine the role of human recombinant activated factor VIIa in clinical practice.

The study in 30 investigated the efficacy and safety of thalidomide for treating recurrent bleeding due to small-intestinal angiodysplasia. The study found that thalidomide reduced bleeding in patients with recurrent bleeding due to small-intestinal angiodysplasia. However, it is important to note that thalidomide can cause adverse events, including constipation, somnolence, limb numbness, peripheral edema, dizziness, and elevated liver enzyme levels.

The study in 20 examined the effectiveness of vitamin K administration for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute or chronic liver disease. The study concluded that it is unknown whether vitamin K administration benefits or harms patients with acute or chronic liver disease experiencing upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

The study in 18 provided an overview of endoscopic hemostasis techniques and clinical scenarios. The study highlighted the importance of endoscopy in diagnosing and treating acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopic hemostasis is a critical technical skill for gastroenterologists, essential for managing acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage and preventing bleeding during high-risk endoscopic procedures. The study emphasized that while there is a lack of strong evidence-based information on endoscopic hemostasis procedures, doctors must be aware of all available devices to choose the most effective option for managing gastrointestinal bleeding.

The study in 7 reviewed the efficacy of argon plasma coagulation therapy for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding compared to other endoscopic therapies. The review concluded that there is no evidence suggesting that argon plasma coagulation is superior to other endoscopic therapies. More randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this treatment.

The study in 1 conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a small bipolar probe for treating bleeding peptic ulcers. The study suggested that the small bipolar probe could stop bleeding or re-bleeding. However, the study also mentioned that the technique is still under development, and further improvements in technology and technique may lead to significant reductions in mortality.

Treatment Summary

The study in 5 concluded that routine early endoscopy may not be necessary for patients whose gastrointestinal bleeding has stopped. If early endoscopy is performed, it should only be done for patients at high risk of re-bleeding or if X-ray films reveal a gastric ulcer or suggest a tumor.

The study in 21 suggested that oral proton pump inhibitors may be an effective option for treating acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

The study in 22 suggested that misoprostol may be an effective treatment for patients taking aspirin or NSAIDs who are suspected of having small bowel ulcers causing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

The study in 11 suggested that endoscopic clipping is an effective treatment for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. It appears to reduce the risk of re-bleeding and the likelihood of requiring surgery.

Benefits and Risks

Benefits Summary

These studies highlight the effectiveness of various pharmacological and endoscopic treatment methods for gastrointestinal bleeding. Specifically, proton pump inhibitors, misoprostol, and endoscopic clipping show promise in lowering the risk of re-bleeding and reducing the need for surgery. Tranexamic acid is also indicated to potentially reduce mortality.

Risks Summary

Treating gastrointestinal bleeding carries various risks. Endoscopic treatment methods, in particular, have a potential for complications, including perforation and bleeding. Additionally, pharmacological treatments can cause side effects. Therefore, it is essential to carefully consider the risks and benefits before initiating any treatment.

Comparison Between Studies

Commonalities

These studies employ research methods such as randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatments for gastrointestinal bleeding. They all focus on assessing the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and endoscopic treatment methods for gastrointestinal bleeding.

Differences

These studies differ in their target patient populations, research designs, and evaluation criteria. Direct comparison of research findings is therefore challenging. However, a comprehensive evaluation of these results can lead to a deeper understanding of the effectiveness and safety of treatment methods for gastrointestinal bleeding.

Consistency and Discrepancies in Results

The results of these studies are not always consistent. For example, the effectiveness of tranexamic acid varies across studies. While some studies suggest that tranexamic acid may reduce mortality, others do not confirm this effect. Inconsistencies like this highlight the need for further research.

Application in Real-World Practice

The findings of these studies provide valuable information for selecting treatment options for gastrointestinal bleeding, but they may not be universally applicable to all patients. Various factors must be considered when choosing a treatment method, such as the patient's age, gender, medical condition, drug history, and previous treatment history. Furthermore, making self-treatment decisions or stopping treatment based solely on these research findings is dangerous. Following the guidance of a physician is crucial when treating gastrointestinal bleeding.

Limitations of Current Research

Several limitations exist in these studies, including small sample sizes, design flaws, and insufficient evaluation criteria. When interpreting these results, it is important to consider these limitations.

Future Research Directions

Further research is needed to gain a deeper understanding of the effectiveness and safety of treatment methods for gastrointestinal bleeding. Specifically, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of newer treatments, such as tranexamic acid and argon plasma coagulation therapy. Basic research focused on clarifying the causes and mechanisms of gastrointestinal bleeding is also important.

Conclusion

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a serious medical emergency with high mortality rates. Various treatments are available, but evidence for their effectiveness and safety is insufficient. These studies offer valuable insights into treatment methods for gastrointestinal bleeding and their effects. However, it is important to acknowledge limitations in these studies. Following the guidance of a physician is essential for treating gastrointestinal bleeding.

List of Treatments

Endoscopic clipping, proton pump inhibitors, misoprostol, tranexamic acid, argon plasma coagulation therapy, human recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), thalidomide, vitamin K, ranitidine, cimetidine, antifibrinolytic amino acids


Literature analysis of 30 papers
Positive Content
24
Neutral Content
4
Negative Content
2
Article Type
12
7
16
14
30

Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Author: ChenHuimin, WuShan, TangMingyu, ZhaoRan, ZhangQingwei, DaiZihao, GaoYunjie, YangShiming, LiZhaoshen, DuYiqi, YangAiming, ZhongLiang, LuLungen, XuLeiming, ShenXizhong, LiuSide, ZhongJie, LiXiaobo, LuHong, XiongHua, ShenYufeng, ChenHaiying, GongShuai, XueHanbing, GeZhizheng


Language : English


This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.