This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effects of ibrutinib: A Synthesis of Findings from 17 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effects of ibrutinib: A Synthesis of Findings from 17 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to Dataset
Please check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Major Research Findings

Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, is a highly effective treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, it can cause side effects, including bleeding, which may be linked to its effects on platelets. 17 found that Ibrutinib-treated CLL patients have platelets with higher membrane fluidity, lower resting membrane potential, and higher levels of reactive oxygen species production compared to untreated patients and healthy volunteers. 8 showed that Ibrutinib has a significant impact on the plasma proteome and immune cells in patients with CLL. This impact is time-dependent and may be due to on-target effects on BTK as well as off-target effects on other kinases. This can lead to side effects like atrial fibrillation, bleeding, and infections. compared Ibrutinib with Acalabrutinib, another BTK inhibitor, and found that both drugs have similar effects on CLL lymphocytes, suggesting a common mechanism of action. investigated the effects of Ibrutinib on murine platelet function and found that it impacts platelet function, particularly during inflammation and primary hemostasis. 14 explored the synergistic anti-tumor effects of combining Ibrutinib with Enzastaurin, a PKCβ inhibitor, in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. compared the differential effects of Ibrutinib and Zanubrutinib, another BTK inhibitor, on NK-cell effector function in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. 9 provided a summary of Ibrutinib side effects and highlighted the importance of monitoring atrial fibrillation and bleeding, which can be severe. 12 investigated the effects of Ibrutinib on T-cell immunity in CLL patients and discovered that it can impact T cell numbers, subsets, TCR repertoire, and immune function. proposed repurposing Ibrutinib for potential therapeutic applications in Alzheimer's disease. 6 investigated the combined use of Ibrutinib and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in CLL and found that while there are encouraging results in clinical trials, Ibrutinib can decrease CD20 expression and inhibit cellular effector mechanisms. 2 found that Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib have distinct effects on atrial electrophysiology and ion channel function, which may explain why Ibrutinib is associated with increased atrial fibrillation susceptibility and SAN dysfunction, while Acalabrutinib is less arrhythmogenic. 15 found that Ibrutinib doesn't affect monocyte FcγR-mediated phagocytosis but suppresses FcγR-mediated cytokine production. examined the synergistic effects of combining Ibrutinib with ABT-199 on proliferation inhibition and apoptosis in mantle cell lymphoma cells. 5 provided an overview of the overlapping and differential effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on various immune cell subsets. explored the effects of Ibrutinib on glucose-lipid metabolism in CLL patients. 16 investigated genetic predictors of Ibrutinib-related cardiovascular side effects. 3 developed an ex vivo high-throughput assay to reveal antiproliferative effects of Idelalisib and Ibrutinib in CLL. 1 conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials to compare adverse drug events associated with Ibrutinib in elderly patients with CLL. 13 showed that Ibrutinib exerts immunomodulatory effects through regulation of tumor-infiltrating macrophages. discussed the cardiovascular side effects of Ibrutinib and its interaction with direct oral anticoagulants. 4 investigated the acute effects of Ibrutinib on ventricular arrhythmia in spontaneously hypertensive rats. 10 reviewed the endocrinological side effects of Ibrutinib.

Benefits and Risks

Benefit Summary

Ibrutinib is an effective treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), leading to tumor shrinkage and potentially extending life expectancy for many patients. 8 , , 14 , 6 , 5 Numerous studies demonstrate Ibrutinib's ability to inhibit CLL cell proliferation and induce apoptosis. It may also modulate immune cell function by changing the tumor microenvironment, enhancing anti-tumor effects. 13 , 12

Risk Summary

Ibrutinib carries risks of side effects, including atrial fibrillation, bleeding, and infections. 8 , 9 , 2 , , 4 , 10 Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common side effects and can occur early in treatment. 17 , The risk of bleeding varies depending on the dose and patient's condition. Ibrutinib can also suppress immune cell function, increasing the risk of infections. 12 These side effects require careful monitoring when using Ibrutinib.

Study Comparisons

Study Commonalities

These studies highlight the potential impact of Ibrutinib on platelets and immune cells in CLL patients, offering important clinical insights. 8 , , 14 , , , 9 , 12 , 2 , 15 , , 5 The studies suggest that Ibrutinib's impact extends beyond BTK pathway inhibition, potentially influencing cell proliferation, apoptosis, immune cell function, and metabolism. These findings lay the groundwork for a deeper understanding of Ibrutinib's efficacy and safety.

Study Differences

These studies offer diverse perspectives on Ibrutinib's mechanisms of action and side effects. 17 focuses on Ibrutinib's influence on platelet membrane fluidity, resting membrane potential, and reactive oxygen species production. contrasts Ibrutinib with Acalabrutinib in terms of their shared and distinct actions. 9 provides a detailed review of Ibrutinib's side effects and management strategies. 2 specifically examines how Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib differentially impact atrial electrophysiological properties. While these studies provide deeper insights, the full spectrum of Ibrutinib's mechanisms and side effects remains under investigation.

Consistency and Contradictions

These studies consistently suggest that Ibrutinib can affect platelets and immune cells in CLL patients. 17 , , , 2 , 15 However, there are some inconsistencies regarding Ibrutinib's side effects and mechanisms. For example, 17 found that Ibrutinib increases platelet membrane fluidity, while reported that Ibrutinib inhibits murine platelet function. Similarly, 2 showed distinct effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on atrial electrophysiology, contrasting with which found similarities in their actions on CLL cells. These contradictions suggest that Ibrutinib's side effects and mechanisms can be influenced by factors like patient condition, dosage, and interactions with other medications. It's also challenging to directly compare the findings across studies due to differences in research methods and patient populations.

Real-World Application Considerations

These studies provide important clinical insights into the potential impact of Ibrutinib on platelets and immune cells in CLL patients. 8 , , 14 , , , 9 , 12 , 2 , 15 , , 5 The studies highlight that Ibrutinib's influence goes beyond BTK pathway inhibition, potentially affecting cell proliferation, apoptosis, immune cell function, and metabolism. This knowledge serves as a foundation for a deeper understanding of Ibrutinib's efficacy and safety. However, these studies represent early stages of research. Further investigations are needed to fully understand Ibrutinib's long-term effects and side effects. When taking Ibrutinib, consulting with a doctor and adhering to prescribed dosage and administration methods is crucial.

Limitations of Current Research

While these studies provide valuable insights into Ibrutinib's side effects and mechanisms, they are not without limitations. 17 , , 9 , 2 Direct comparisons of findings can be challenging due to differences in research methods and patient populations. Additionally, the complex nature of Ibrutinib's side effects, influenced by factors like patient condition, dosage, and drug interactions, demands further research to decipher its intricate mechanisms. Moreover, long-term effects and side effects of Ibrutinib require further investigation, calling for extended observational studies to provide a complete picture.

Future Research Directions

These studies have revealed significant insights regarding Ibrutinib's side effects and mechanisms, but a complete understanding is still evolving. 8 , , 14 , , , 9 , 12 , 2 , 15 , , 5 Future research should consider multiple factors that might influence Ibrutinib's side effects, such as patient age, gender, co-medications, and genetic predisposition. Studies incorporating these factors could lead to better prediction and prevention strategies for Ibrutinib-related side effects. Furthermore, longer-term observational studies are essential to assess Ibrutinib's long-term effects and side effects. Through these efforts, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of Ibrutinib's safety and efficacy, maximizing benefits for patients.

Conclusion

Ibrutinib, while an effective treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), carries risks of side effects such as atrial fibrillation, bleeding, and infections. 8 , , 14 , , , 9 , 12 , 2 , 15 , , 5 Close monitoring for these side effects is crucial. Continued research is necessary to gain a deeper understanding of Ibrutinib's mechanisms and side effects, ultimately leading to improved patient care and outcomes.


Literature analysis of 17 papers
Positive Content
14
Neutral Content
0
Negative Content
3
Article Type
0
1
1
3
16

Language : English


Author: PrimoDaniel, ScarfòLydia, XochelliAliki, MattssonMattias, RanghettiPamela, EspinosaAna Belén, RoblesAlicia, GorrochateguiJulian, Martínez-LópezJoaquín, de la SernaJavier, GonzálezMarcos, GilAlberto Chaparro, AnguitaEduardo, IrahetaSandra, MunugalavadlaVeerendra, QuévaChristophe, TannheimerStacey, RosenquistRichard, StamatopoulosKostas, BallesterosJoan, GhiaPaolo


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.