Effects of meperidine injection: A Synthesis of Findings from 9 Studies
- Home
- Effects of meperidine injection
This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.
This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effects of meperidine injection: A Synthesis of Findings from 9 Studies", please consult your doctor.
For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to DatasetPlease check the disclaimer.
Main Research Findings
Multiple studies have investigated the effects of meperidine injection, highlighting its potential benefits and risks in various contexts. 7 found that increasing the dose of meperidine for spinal anesthesia in African men from 1.2 to 1.5 mg/kg prolonged the duration of sensory block but did not affect the level of block or increase the incidence of side effects. 3 explored meperidine's effects on thermoregulation in mice, demonstrating its effectiveness in treating shivering compared to other opioids, particularly pure mu-agonists. 1 examined the subjective, behavioral, and physiological effects of intravenous meperidine in healthy volunteers, showing that it produced dose-related mood changes, including sedation, feelings of detachment, and drug effects that could persist for up to 4-5 hours. 5 reported two cases of vastus lateralis atrophy after intramuscular meperidine injection, emphasizing a potential risk associated with the drug's administration. 8 investigated the effects of meperidine-induced shivering inhibition on core temperature afterdrop and rewarming in hypothermic humans, demonstrating that suppressing shivering can lead to increased afterdrop and slowed rewarming. 2 reported a suspected case of acute meperidine toxicity in a dog, highlighting the potential for severe adverse reactions if the drug is administered incorrectly. 6 compared the efficacy of subcutaneous hydromorphone and intramuscular meperidine for immediate postoperative analgesia, finding that hydromorphone was as effective as meperidine with a more favorable injection technique and fewer side effects.
Benefits and Risks
Benefits Summary
Meperidine has been shown to be effective in managing pain in various settings. 3 highlighted its effectiveness in treating shivering compared to other opioids. 7 demonstrated that increasing the dose of meperidine for spinal anesthesia can prolong the duration of pain relief. 6 found that subcutaneous hydromorphone, a similar drug, was as effective as meperidine for postoperative pain management, suggesting meperidine's potential for pain relief.
Risks Summary
Meperidine can cause side effects such as fatigue, itching, nausea, respiratory depression, and decreased blood pressure. 7 found no significant difference in the incidence of side effects between different doses. Respiratory depression and blood pressure drops were observed within 5-50 minutes of meperidine injection. 5 highlighted a rare but serious risk of vastus lateralis atrophy after intramuscular meperidine injection. Overdosing on meperidine can lead to severe toxicity, as seen in the case of a dog in 2 .
Comparison between Studies
Similarities
Several studies consistently indicate that meperidine can be effective in managing pain, but it can also lead to adverse effects, particularly respiratory depression and decreased blood pressure.
Differences
The effects of meperidine vary depending on factors such as the route of administration, dose, and patient population. For example, 7 showed prolonged pain relief with increased meperidine doses for spinal anesthesia, while 1 observed a dose-dependent increase in sedation and subjective drug effects in healthy volunteers. These findings highlight the importance of considering individual patient characteristics and optimizing meperidine use for individual needs.
Consistency and Contradictions of Findings
The findings regarding meperidine's effects show both consistency and contradictions. While several studies consistently demonstrate its effectiveness for pain relief and potential for adverse effects, particularly respiratory depression and blood pressure changes, inconsistencies arise in the specific effects depending on factors like dose, route of administration, and patient population. These contradictions highlight the need for further research to fully understand the complex effects of meperidine.
Considerations for Practical Applications
While meperidine shows potential for pain management, its use should be approached with caution due to the risk of adverse effects. Always follow a healthcare professional's instructions and avoid self-medicating. Seek immediate medical attention if any concerning symptoms, such as breathing difficulties or blood pressure changes, arise during meperidine use.
Limitations of Current Research
The current research on meperidine has limitations. More research is needed to fully understand how factors like patient characteristics and administration methods influence its effects. Additionally, long-term safety data on meperidine use requires further investigation.
Directions for Future Research
To further understand the effects of meperidine, future research should focus on the following areas: * Conducting studies comparing the effects of meperidine in different patient populations * Investigating how different administration methods and doses affect meperidine's efficacy and side effects * Conducting long-term studies to assess the long-term safety of meperidine use
Conclusion
Meperidine has potential as a pain management tool, but it can also cause adverse effects. Follow healthcare professional guidance, avoid self-medication, and seek medical attention for any concerning symptoms. More research is needed to thoroughly understand the complex effects of meperidine and ensure its safe and effective use.
Benefit Keywords
Risk Keywords
Article Type
Subjective, behavioral and physiological responses to intravenous meperidine in healthy volunteers.
Author: ZacnyJ P, LichtorJ L, BinstockW, CoalsonD W, CutterT, FlemmingD C, GlostenB
Language : English
Author: GolderFrancis J, WilsonJeffrey, LarenzaM Paula, FinkOwen T
Language : English
Author: HöckerJan, ParisAndrea, ScholzJens, TonnerPeter H, NielsenMartin, BeinBerthold
Language : English
Author: MovafeghAli, SoroushAhmad Reza, NaviAli, SadeghiMustafa, EsfehaniFatimah, Akbarian-TefaghiNiloufar
Language : English
Author: HaberM, KovanE, AndaryM, HonetJ
Language : English
Author: ChanW H, LinC J, SunW Z, TsaiS P, TsaiS K, HsiehC Y
Language : English
Author: HansenD, HansenS
Language : English
Author: GiesbrechtG G, GoheenM S, JohnstonC E, KennyG P, BristowG K, HaywardJ S
Language : English
Subjective, behavioral and physiological responses to intravenous meperidine in healthy volunteers.
Author: ZacnyJ P, LichtorJ L, BinstockW, CoalsonD W, CutterT, FlemmingD C, GlostenB
Language : English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.