This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effects of vemurafenib: A Synthesis of Findings from 18 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effects of vemurafenib: A Synthesis of Findings from 18 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to Dataset
Please check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Major Research Findings

Vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, is a first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic melanoma. However, it has been shown to be phototoxic towards normal skin cells. 2 demonstrated that vemurafenib promotes photosensitization to UVA radiation in human skin fibroblasts, leading to a decrease in cell viability. This effect is mediated by the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which leads to lipid peroxidation and damage to various cell organelles, including the plasma membrane, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, lysosomes, and actin filaments. Ultimately, mitochondrial impairment results in caspase activation and apoptosis. 4 explored the impact of vemurafenib on skin integrity, revealing that it activates MEK-ERK signaling in both keratinocytes and fibroblasts, leading to hyperkeratosis and potentially even skin cancer initiation in certain genetic backgrounds. 16 investigated the pharmacodynamic effects of vemurafenib in patients with BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma, demonstrating that it effectively inhibits MAPK signaling and cell cycle progression. However, the study also identified mechanisms of resistance, including reactivation of MAPK signaling due to secondary mutations in NRAS and MEK1. 18 reported cutaneous toxic effects associated with vemurafenib, including the development of eruptive squamous cell carcinomas. 7 explored the potential of combining vemurafenib with a c-Met inhibitor, PHA-665752, in treating human colorectal cancer cells with BRAFV600E mutations, finding synergistic inhibitory effects on cell growth. 11 suggested that systemic retinoids, such as acitretin, might help ameliorate vemurafenib-related cutaneous side effects. 5 investigated the influence of pharmacogenetic variants on vemurafenib-related toxicities in melanoma patients, finding associations between specific polymorphisms and increased risks of certain adverse events. 1 researched the reversal of vemurafenib-resistance in primary melanoma cells by combining romidepsin and type I IFN treatment, suggesting a promising approach for overcoming resistance. 3 introduced a novel shikonin derivative, SK119, which exhibits anti-tumor activity against melanoma cell lines and demonstrates synergistic effects when combined with vemurafenib and cobimetinib. 6 demonstrated synergistic effects of vemurafenib and fingolimod (FTY720) in vemurafenib-resistant melanoma cell lines, suggesting a potential strategy for overcoming resistance. 9 investigated the influence of hypoxia on the effects of vemurafenib on melanoma cells, highlighting the role of CSPG4 in modulating treatment resistance. 15 conducted a systematic review of severe adverse events associated with various melanoma treatment agents, including vemurafenib. 10 provided a detailed analysis of vemurafenib's effectiveness and adverse effects, including its impact on survival and the prevalence of side effects. 8 highlighted the importance of managing side effects associated with vemurafenib therapy. 12 compared the differential effects of vemurafenib (PLX4032) and its progenitor PLX4720 on ABCB1 function. 17 reported on a prospective study of cutaneous side effects associated with vemurafenib in a group of 42 patients. 14 provided a case report and discussion on cutaneous side effects observed in a patient undergoing vemurafenib treatment.

Benefits and Risks

Benefit Summary

Vemurafenib has demonstrated significant benefit in treating patients with BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma. 16 8 It effectively inhibits tumor growth and can lead to tumor shrinkage or complete disappearance in some cases. 8

Risk Summary

Vemurafenib can cause various side effects, including skin reactions, nausea, hyperbilirubinemia, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. 16 18 5 It can also lead to the development of resistance, particularly in patients with secondary mutations in NRAS and MEK1. 16 Vemurafenib can also increase sensitivity to sunlight, requiring the use of sunscreen and sun protection measures. 2 It may affect organs such as the liver and kidneys, and there's a slightly increased risk of developing other types of cancer. 10 Vemurafenib should not be used during pregnancy or breastfeeding. 8

Comparison of Studies

Commonalities

Many studies agree that vemurafenib is an effective treatment option for patients with BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma. 16 8 Multiple studies also report the occurrence of side effects, particularly skin toxicities, associated with vemurafenib. 16 18 5 11 8

Differences

The frequency and severity of cutaneous toxicities associated with vemurafenib can vary depending on the study. 17 10 The incidence of resistance to vemurafenib also differs across studies. 16 Vemurafenib has shown potential for treating cancers beyond melanoma. 7 6 9 However, the effectiveness and safety of vemurafenib for other cancer types require further investigation. 15

Consistency and Contradictions

While there's a consistent finding that vemurafenib is effective in treating BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma, 16 8 the extent of cutaneous toxicity and resistance can differ across studies. 16 18 5 17 10 These discrepancies could be explained by differences in study design, patient populations, evaluation methods, and other factors. 15 Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of vemurafenib for treating other cancer types. 7 6 9

Practical Implications and Considerations

Vemurafenib is an effective treatment option for BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma, but it carries the risk of side effects. 16 18 5 11 8 Therefore, it's crucial to consult with a physician before starting vemurafenib therapy, understanding both the risks and benefits. 15 Regular blood tests, imaging scans, and close monitoring are essential for early detection and management of potential side effects. 8 Furthermore, it's essential to take precautions against sunlight exposure, such as using sunscreen and seeking shade, as vemurafenib can increase skin sensitivity to UV radiation. 2

Limitations of Current Research

Research on vemurafenib is still in its early stages, with further studies needed to fully understand its long-term safety, effectiveness, and strategies for overcoming resistance. 15 16 10 Additionally, more research is necessary to determine the efficacy and safety of vemurafenib for treating cancers beyond melanoma. 7 6 9

Future Research Directions

Continued research is essential to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of vemurafenib. 15 10 Further investigation into strategies to overcome resistance to vemurafenib is also crucial. 16 Exploring the potential of vemurafenib for treating other cancer types is another essential area of research. 7 6 9 These research endeavors hold promise for expanding the safe and effective use of vemurafenib to benefit more patients.

Conclusion

Vemurafenib is a valuable treatment option for patients with BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma. 16 8 However, it's important to be aware of the potential side effects. 16 18 5 11 8 Before starting vemurafenib therapy, patients should discuss the risks and benefits with their doctor. 15


Literature analysis of 18 papers
Positive Content
13
Neutral Content
3
Negative Content
2
Article Type
1
0
1
2
18

Language : English


Author: GoeyAndrew Kl, WithMirjam de, AgemaBram C, HoopEsther Oomen-De, SinghRajbir K, van der VeldtAstrid Am, MathijssenRon Hj, van SchaikRon Hn, BinsSander


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Author: RibasAntoni, ZhangWeijiang, ChangIlsung, ShiraiKeisuke, ErnstoffMarc S, DaudAdil, CoweyC Lance, DanielsGregory, SejaElizabeth, O'LacoElizabeth, GlaspyJohn A, ChmielowskiBartosz, HillTodd, JoeAndrew K, GrippoJoseph F


Language : English


Language : English


Author: TrunzerKerstin, PavlickAnna C, SchuchterLynn, GonzalezRene, McArthurGrant A, HutsonThomas E, MoschosStergios J, FlahertyKeith T, KimKevin B, WeberJeffrey S, HerseyPeter, LongGeorgina V, LawrenceDonald, OttPatrick A, AmaravadiRavi K, LewisKarl D, PuzanovIgor, LoRoger S, KoehlerAstrid, KockxMark, SpleissOlivia, Schell-StevenAnnette, GilbertHouston N, CockeyLouise, BollagGideon, LeeRichard J, JoeAndrew K, SosmanJeffrey A, RibasAntoni


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.