Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

The efficacy of nebulized racemic epinephrine in children with acute asthma: a randomized, double-blind trial.

Author: KlassenT P, OsmondM H, PlintA C

Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.

Overview

This study investigated whether nebulized epinephrine, compared to nebulized salbutamol, causes greater clinical improvement in children with acute asthma.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Recent work in bronchiolitis has demonstrated a significant clinical improvement in children treated with epinephrine over nebulized salbutamol. The objective of this study was to determine whether nebulized epinephrine, as compared with nebulized salbutamol, causes a greater clinical improvement in...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01258.x

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Nebulized Epinephrine: A More Effective Oasis in the Desert of Asthma

Asthma, like a persistent desert sandstorm, can cause significant respiratory distress. This randomized, double-blind trial compares the efficacy of nebulized epinephrine with nebulized salbutamol in children with acute asthma.

Nebulized Epinephrine: A Potential Solution?

The study results, like discovering a hidden spring in the desert, suggest that nebulized epinephrine may be more effective than nebulized salbutamol in improving clinical symptoms in children with acute asthma.

Health Implications and Application

These findings, like a beacon of hope in the desert of asthma management, may lead to changes in clinical practice, suggesting that nebulized epinephrine should be considered as a first-line treatment option for acute asthma in children.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

Navigating the desert of asthma can be a daunting task for children and their families. This study offers a glimmer of hope, suggesting that nebulized epinephrine may be a more effective treatment option for acute asthma. However, the desert of medical research is vast, and we must continue to explore new and improved treatments to provide optimal care for children with this chronic respiratory condition.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2000-11-29
  2. Date Revised 2019-09-10
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

11015240

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01258.x

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.