Comparative oral and topical decongestant effects of phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine.

Author: EganR W, EricksonC H, HeyJ A, McLeodR L, MingoG G, PedersenO F

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Nonselective adrenergic alpha-agonists such as phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine are widely used as decongestants to treat nasal congestion associated with a variety of nasal diseases. Although the activity of these drugs is well established in clinical studies, a direct comparison of their ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.2500/105065801781543772

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Comparing Decongestant Effects of Phenylpropanolamine and D-Pseudoephedrine

The field of nasal congestion management is like a vast desert, often presenting challenges in finding effective relief. This study examines the comparative decongestant effects of phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine, two nonselective adrenergic alpha-agonists commonly used to treat nasal congestion. The researchers utilized a feline model of nasal congestion to evaluate the drugs' effects on nasal cavity volume, minimum cross-sectional area, and distance to the minimum cross-sectional area. They found that both oral and topical administrations of phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine effectively attenuated nasal congestion, with similar decongestant profiles. However, both drugs produced significant increases in systolic blood pressure.

Equieffective Decongestant Activity with Significant Blood Pressure Increases

The study demonstrates that both phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine exhibit comparable decongestant activity, regardless of the route of administration. However, both drugs significantly increased systolic blood pressure, highlighting a potential cardiovascular risk associated with their use. This research provides valuable insights into the therapeutic efficacy and potential adverse effects of these commonly used decongestants.

Navigating the Desert of Nasal Congestion Relief

The study's findings offer a valuable glimpse into the effectiveness and potential risks associated with phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine for managing nasal congestion. The research highlights the need for careful consideration of the potential cardiovascular side effects associated with these decongestants. This study is a reminder that the desert of nasal congestion management often involves navigating the delicate balance between therapeutic benefits and potential risks.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the comparative decongestant effects of phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine. The research highlights the equieffective decongestant activity of these drugs but also underscores the need for caution due to their significant impact on systolic blood pressure. This study is a reminder that the quest for effective nasal congestion relief often involves navigating the delicate balance between therapeutic benefits and potential risks.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2001-09-27
  2. Date Revised 2019-11-04
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

11345158

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.2500/105065801781543772

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.