Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Review conclusions by Ernst and Canter regarding spinal manipulation refuted.

Author: AssendelftWillem J J, BouterLex, BronfortGert, DagenaisSimon, EvansRoni, HaasMitchell, MoherDavid, RosnerAnthony, TrianoJohn, van TulderMaurits

EditorialAn article in which the editor or publisher expresses their opinion or perspective on a particular topic or issue. Its purpose is to convey a specific message or idea to the reader.

Overview

This commentary challenges a review that concluded spinal manipulation is not an effective intervention for any condition except back pain. The authors argue that the review did not adhere to standard systematic review methodology and did not adequately assess the hazards of manipulation. They conclude that the review's conclusions are misleading and not supported by evidence.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
In the April 2006 issue of the Journal of Royal Society of Medicine, Ernst and Canter authored a review of the most recent systematic reviews on the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for any condition. The authors concluded that, except for back pain, spinal manipulation is not an effective inter...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1563471/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）
in preparation
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2007-07-25
  2. Date Revised 2020-09-29
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

16887028

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC1563471

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Side Effects of spinal manipulation
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.